Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18765812›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Regulation of TATA-binding protein dynamics in living yeast cells.

Rebekka O Sprouse, Tatiana S Karpova, Florian Mueller, Arindam Dasgupta, James G McNally, David T Auble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Live-cell analysis of endogenous GFP-RPB1 uncovers rapid turnover of initiating and promoter-paused RNA Polymerase II.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebekka O SprouseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Health System, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Tatiana S Karpova
Florian Mueller
Arindam Dasgupta
James G McNally
David T Auble

Funding

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF A YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATORR01GM055763 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI AUBLE, DAVID T. · 1997 to 2021
$6.4M
Transcription factor mobilityZIABC010561 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MCNALLY, JAMES G · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS GM55763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pathways for assembly of RNA polymerase (Pol) II transcription preinitiation complexes (PICs) have been well established in vitro, relatively little is known about the dynamic behavior of Pol II general transcription factors in vivo. In vitro, a subset of Pol II factors facilitates reinitiation by remaining very stably bound to the promoter. This behavior contrasts markedly with the highly dynamic behavior of RNA Pol I transcription complexes in vivo, which undergo cycles of disassembly/reassembly at the promoter for each round of transcription. To determine whether the dynamic behavior of the Pol II machinery in vivo is fundamentally different from that of Pol I and whether the static behavior of Pol II factors in vitro fully recapitulates their behavior in vivo, we used fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Surprisingly, we found that all or nearly all of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) population is highly mobile in vivo, displaying FRAP recovery rates of <15 s. These high rates require the activity of the TBP-associated factor Mot1, suggesting that TBP/chromatin interactions are destabilized by active cellular processes. Furthermore, the distinguishable FRAP behavior of TBP and TBP-associated factor 1 indicates that there are populations of these molecules that are independent of one another. The distinct FRAP behavior of most Pol II factors that we tested suggests that transcription complexes assemble via stochastic multistep pathways. Our data indicate that active Pol II PICs can be much more dynamic than previously considered.

Indexed as

MutationPhotobleachingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTATA-Box Binding ProteinTATA-Box Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID18765812
PMCPMC2533185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.