Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18765444›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Effect of illicit direct to consumer advertising on use of etanercept, mometasone, and tegaserod in Canada: controlled longitudinal study.

Michael R Law, Sumit R Majumdar, Stephen B Soumerai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of policies regulating drug marketing.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Associations between cancer-related information seeking and receiving PET imaging for routine cancer surveillance--an analysis of longitudinal survey data.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reforming direct-to-consumer advertising.Nature biotechnology · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Should Canada allow direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs?: no.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael R LawDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA. mlaw@post.harvard.edu
Sumit R Majumdar
Stephen B Soumerai

Funding

THE HMO RESEARCH NETWORK CERTU18HS010391 · AHRQ · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI PLATT, RICHARD · 2000 to 2006
$799k
AHRQ HHS U18HS010391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs in the United States on Canadian prescribing rates for three heavily marketed drugs-etanercept, mometasone, and tegaserod.

designControlled quasi-experimental study using interrupted time series analysis. POPULATION: Representative sample of 2700 Canadian pharmacies and prescription data from 50 US Medicaid programmes.

main outcome measuresDifferences in number of filled prescriptions per 10,000 population per month between English speaking and French speaking (control) Canadian provinces before and after the start of direct to consumer advertising in the United States.

resultsSpending on direct to consumer advertising for study drugs ranged from $194m to $314m ( pound104m- pound169m; euro131m-euro212m) over the study period. Prescription rates for etanercept and mometasone did not increase in English speaking provinces relative to French speaking controls after the start of direct to consumer advertising. In contrast, tegaserod prescriptions increased 42% (0.56 prescriptions/10,000 residents, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.76) in English speaking provinces immediately after the start of US direct to consumer advertising. Uncontrolled analysis of US Medicaid data showed a larger 56% increase in tegaserod prescriptions. However, this increase did not persist over time in either country, despite continued advertising.

conclusionsExposure to US direct to consumer advertising transiently influenced both Canadian and US prescribing rates for tegaserod, a drug later withdrawn owing to safety concerns. The impact of direct to consumer advertising on drug use seems to be highly variable and probably depends on the characteristics of the advertised drug, the level of exposure to direct to consumer advertising, and the cultural context.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCanadaDrug ApprovalDrug CostsDrug PrescriptionsEtanerceptHumansImmunoglobulin GIndolesLongitudinal StudiesMarketing of Health ServicesMometasone FuroatePregnadienediolsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorUnited StatesEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GIndolesMometasone FuroatePregnadienediolsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factortegaserod

Identifiers

PMID18765444
PMCPMC2528895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.