Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18765256›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2008

Understanding the molecular basis of HBV drug resistance by molecular modeling.

Ashoke Sharon, Chung K Chu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Removal of Integrated Hepatitis B Virus DNA Using CRISPR-Cas9.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Molecular and Structural Basis of HBV-resistance to Nucleos(t)ide Analogs.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashoke SharonDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Chung K Chu
University of Georgia · US

Funding

SYNTHESIS &BIOTRANSFORMATION OF ANTI-HIV PRODURUGSR01AI025899 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI CHU, CHUNG K · 1987 to 2000
$354k
NIAID NIH HHS AI25889NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI025899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the significant successes in the area of anti-HBV agents, resistance and cross-resistance against available therapeutics are the major hurdles in drug discovery. The present investigation is to understand the molecular basis of drug resistance conferred by the B and C domain mutations of HBV-polymerase on the binding affinity of five anti-HBV agents [lamivudine (3TC, 1), adefovir (ADV, 2), entecavir (ETV, 3), telbivudine (LdT, 4) and clevudine (l-FMAU, 5)]. In this regard, homology modeled structure of HBV-polymerase was used for minimization, conformational search and induced fit docking followed by binding energy calculation on wild-type as well as on mutant HBV-polymerases (L180M, M204V, M204I, L180M+M204V, L180M-M204I). Our studies suggest a significant correlation between the fold resistances and the binding affinity of anti-HBV nucleosides. The binding mode studies reveals that the domain C residue M204 is closely associated with sugar/pseudosugar ring positioning in the active site. The positioning of oxathiolane ring of 3TC (1) is plausible due the induced fit orientation of the M204 residue in wild-type, and further mutation of M204 to V204 or I204 reduces the final binding affinity which leads to the drug resistance. The domain B residue L180 is not directly close ( approximately 6A) to the nucleoside/nucleoside analogs, but indirectly associated with other active-site hydrophobic residues such as A87, F88, P177 and M204. These five hydrophobic residues can directly affect on the incoming nucleoside analogs in terms of its association and interaction that can alter the final binding affinity. There was no sugar ring shifting observed in the case of adefovir (2) and entecavir (3), and the position of sugar ring of 2 and 3 is found similar to the sugar position of natural substrate dATP and dGTP, respectively. The exocyclic double bond of entecavir (3) occupied in the backside hydrophobic pocket (made by residues A87, F88, P177, L180 and M204), which enhances the overall binding affinity. The active site binding of LdT (4) and l-FMAU (5) showed backward shifting along with upward movement without enforcing M204 residue and this significant different binding mode makes these molecules as polymerase inhibitors, without being incorporated into the growing HBV-DNA chain. Structural results conferred by these l- and d-nucleosides, explored the molecular basis of drug resistance which can be utilized for future anti-HBV drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralAntiviral AgentsDrug DiscoveryGene Products, polHepatitis BHepatitis B virusHumansModels, MolecularMutationProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryAntiviral AgentsGene Products, polP protein, Hepatitis B virus

Identifiers

PMID18765256
PMCPMC2626186
OpenAlexW2020150466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.