Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18762909›Full record

SynthesisDer Orthopade2008

[Patients with pre-existing chronic pain and/or psychological problems].

M Schiltenwolf, R Klinger

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Orthopade, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M SchiltenwolfSektion Schmerztherapie, Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. marcus.schiltenwolf@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
R Klinger
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing pain chronification and psychological problems can affect the degree of perioperative pain and hence the postoperative outcome. Most elective surgery performed on the musculoskeletal system is indicated because of pain. To avoid perioperative complications it is therefore essential to identify patients with existing pain chronification before surgery is performed. Based on a systematic literature review, studies on orthopaedic surgery were filtered for existing pain chronification and checked in order to deduce clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations. In summary, unproblematic pain is characterised by good organic explainability, lack of pain generalisation, no additional physical complaints, appropriate management of the physical damage encountered and suitable use of analgesics. In line with what is known about the mechanisms of pain chronification, patients with existing chronification usually display additional psychological problems. These psychological factors ought to be established prior to surgery. A preliminary non-surgical treatment could potentially also lead to a reassessment of the indication for surgery.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineMental DisordersOrthopedicsPainAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleNerve BlockPain ManagementPostoperative PainPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID18762909
OpenAlexW1554420077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.