ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2008
Collision coupling, crosstalk, and compartmentalization in G-protein coupled receptor systems: can a single model explain disparate results?
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design principles of ciliary signaling.Journal of cell science · 2025Review
- G protein-gated inwardly rectifying KHistology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic polarity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine.The Journal of cell biology · 2019Article
- Pancreatic Beta Cell G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Second Messenger Interactions: A Systems Biology Computational Analysis.PloS one · 2016Article
- Segregation and crosstalk of D1 receptor-mediated activation of ERK in striatal medium spiny neurons upon acute administration of psychostimulants.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Gi/o-coupled receptors compete for signaling to adenylyl cyclase in SH-SY5Y cells and reduce opioid-mediated cAMP overshoot.Molecular pharmacology · 2011Article
- Use of the GTPγS ([35S]GTPγS and Eu-GTPγS) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2010Review
- Dynamics of mouse rod phototransduction and its sensitivity to variation of key parameters.IET systems biology · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The collision coupling model describes interactions between receptors and G-proteins as first requiring the molecules to find each other by diffusion. A variety of experimental data on G-protein activation have been interpreted as suggesting (or not) the compartmentalization of receptors and/or G-proteins in addition to a collision coupling mechanism. In this work, we use a mathematical model of G-protein activation via collision coupling but without compartmentalization to demonstrate that these disparate observations do not imply the existence of such compartments. In experiments with GTP analogs (commonly GTPgammaS), the extent of G-protein activation is predicted to be a function of both receptor number and the rate of GTP analog hydrolysis. The sensitivity of G-protein activation to receptor number is shown to be dependent upon the assay used, with the sensitivity of phosphate production assays (GTPase) >GTPgammaS-binding assays >cAMP inhibition assays. Finally, the amount of competition or crosstalk between receptor species activating the same type of G-proteins is predicted to depend on receptor and G-protein number, but in some (common) experimental regimes this dependence is expected to be minimal. Taken together, these observations suggest that the collision coupling model, without compartments of receptors and/or G-proteins, is sufficient to explain a variety of observations in literature data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.