Trial reportPatient education and counseling2008
Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy.
Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Pooled it
- Addressing Health Literacy in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Pooled it
- Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Pooled it
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Pooled it
- Providing information about options in patient decision aids.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Pooled it
- Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Commercially Available Mobile Phone Applications for Prostate Cancer Education.American journal of men's healthPooled it
- Effectiveness of Visual-Based Interventions on Understanding Cancer Information: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- ¡Yo no Estoy Loca! A Behavioral Health Telenovela Style Entertainment Education Video: Increasing Mental Health Literacy Among Latinas.Community mental health journal · 2022Trial
- A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.American journal of public health · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Tailored approaches to stroke health education (TASHE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2015Trial
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate an entertainment-based patient decision aid for prostate cancer screening among patients with low or high health literacy.
methodsMale primary care patients from two clinical sites, one characterized as serving patients with low health literacy (n=149) and the second as serving patients with high health literacy (n=301), were randomized to receive an entertainment-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening or an audiobooklet-control aid with the same learner content but without the entertainment features. Postintervention and 2-week follow-up assessments were conducted.
resultsPatients at the low-literacy site were more engaged with the entertainment-based aid than patients at the high-literacy site. Overall, knowledge improved for all patients. Among patients at the low-literacy site, the entertainment-based aid was associated with lower decisional conflict and greater self-advocacy (i.e., mastering and obtaining information about screening) when compared to patients given the audiobooklet. No differences between the aids were observed for patients at the high-literacy site.
conclusionEntertainment education may be an effective strategy for promoting informed decision making about prostate cancer screening among patients with lower health literacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As barriers to implementing computer-based patient decision support programs decrease, alternative models for delivering these programs should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.