Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18760353›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2008

Bacterial therapies: completing the cancer treatment toolbox.

Adam T St Jean, Miaomin Zhang, Neil S Forbes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Systemic administration ofJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  10. Coating bacteria for anti-tumor therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. A novel tumor-targeting strain ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Microbiome in human cancers.Access microbiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Engineering bacteria for cancer therapy.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Biomedicines · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam T St JeanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-9303, USA.
Miaomin Zhang
Neil S Forbes
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Engineering Salmonella to be a targeted intratumoral anti-cancer therapeuticR01CA120825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORBES, NEIL S. · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA120825-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current cancer therapies have limited efficacy because they are highly toxic, ineffectively target tumors, and poorly penetrate tumor tissue. Engineered bacteria have the unique potential to overcome these limitations by actively targeting all tumor regions and delivering therapeutic payloads. Examples of transport mechanisms include specific chemotaxis, preferred growth, and hypoxic germination. Deleting the ribose/galactose chemoreceptor has been shown to cause bacterial accumulation in therapeutically resistant tumor regions. Recent advances in engineered therapeutic delivery include temporal control of cytotoxin release, enzymatic activation of pro-drugs, and secretion of physiologically active biomolecules. Bacteria have been engineered to express tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha, hypoxia-inducible-factor-1-alpha antibodies, interleukin-2, and cytosine deaminase. Combining these emerging targeting and therapeutic delivery mechanisms will yield a complete treatment toolbox and increase patient survival.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaDrug Delivery SystemsGenetic EnhancementHumansNeoplasmsProbioticsProdrugsProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID18760353
PMCPMC2600537
OpenAlexW2131722151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.