Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18760319›Full record

ArticleVaccine2008

A heterologous DNA prime/protein boost immunization strategy for rhesus cytomegalovirus.

Kristina Abel, Lisa Strelow, Yujuan Yue, Meghan K Eberhardt, Kimberli A Schmidt, Peter A Barry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonhuman primate models of pediatric viral diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neutralization of rhesus cytomegalovirus IL-10 reduces horizontal transmission and alters long-term immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina AbelCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Lisa Strelow
Yujuan Yue
Meghan K Eberhardt
Kimberli A Schmidt
Peter A Barry
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

ZONA PELLUCIDA PEPTIDES AS IMMUNOCONTRACEPTIVE ANTIGENSP51RR000169 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HYDE, DALLAS MELVIN · 1985 to 2011
$126.2M
Prevention of Primary HCMV Infection by Vaccinating against HCMV-Encoded IL-10R01AI049342 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BARRY, PETER A, WALTER, MARK R · 2002 to 2017
$6.9M
Evaluation of Protective CMV Vaccines in Rhesus MacaquesR01AI063356 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BARRY, PETER A, DIAMOND, DON J · 2005 to 2014
$4.6M
Prevention of Primary HCMV Infection by Vaccinating Against HCMV-Encoded IL-10R56AI049342 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BARRY, PETER A, WALTER, MARK R · 2012 to 2012
$401k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000169NCRR NIH HHS RR000169NIAID NIH HHS AI063356NIAID NIH HHS AI49342NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049342NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063356NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI049342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previous study in nonhuman primates demonstrated that genetic immunization against the rhesus cytomegalovirus phosphoprotein 65-2 (pp65-2) and glycoprotein B (gB) antigens both stimulated antigen-specific antibodies and CD8 T cell responses, and significantly reduced plasma viral loads following intravenous challenge with RhCMV. It was also noted in this study that weak CD4 T cell and neutralizing antibody responses were generated by DNA alone. To broaden the type of immune responses, a DNA prime/protein boost strategy was used in seronegative macaques, consisting of four DNA immunizations against pp65-2, gB, and immediate-early 1 (IE1), followed by two boosts with formalin-inactivated RhCMV virions. This heterologous prime/boost strategy elicited robust antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in addition to biologically relevant neutralizing antibody titers. Animals were challenged with RhCMV delivered into four sites via a subcutaneous route. Skin biopsies of one of the inoculation sites 7 days post challenge revealed marked differences in the level of RhCMV replication between the vaccinated and control monkeys. Whereas the inoculation site in the controls was noted for a prominent inflammatory response and numerous cytomegalic, antigen-positive (IE1) cells, the inoculation site in the vaccinees was characterized by an absence of inflammation and antigen-positive cells. All five vaccinees developed robust recall responses to viral antigens, and four of them exhibited long-term viral immune responses consistent with effective control of viral expression and replication. These results demonstrate that a heterologous DNA prime/protein boost strategy greatly expands the breadth of antiviral immune responses and greatly reduces the level of viral replication at the primary site of challenge infection.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus VaccinesImmunization, SecondaryVaccines, DNAAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsImmediate-Early ProteinsMacaca mulattaPhosphoproteinsPlasmidsVaccinationViral Envelope ProteinsViral Matrix ProteinsAntibodies, Viralcytomegalovirus matrix protein 65kDaCytomegalovirus Vaccinesglycoprotein B, SimplexvirusIE1 protein, cytomegalovirusImmediate-Early ProteinsPhosphoproteinsVaccines, DNAViral Envelope ProteinsViral Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18760319
PMCPMC2747630
OpenAlexW2016777057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.