Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18759977›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Haplotype block partitioning as a tool for dimensionality reduction in SNP association studies.

Cristian Pattaro, Ingo Ruczinski, Danièle M Fallin, Giovanni Parmigiani

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical and Metabolic Signatures ofKidney international reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An innovative procedure of genome-wide association analysis fits studies on germplasm population and plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristian PattaroUnit of Genetic Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Genetic Medicine, European Academy, Viale Druso 1, I-39100, Bolzano, Italy. cristian.pattaro@eurac.edu
Ingo Ruczinski
Danièle M Fallin
Giovanni Parmigiani
Johns Hopkins University · USEurac Research · IT

Funding

Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimers DiseaseR01AG020688 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FALLIN, MARGARET DANIELE · 2003 to 2007
$5.0M
Adaptive Function Estimation for Genomic DataR01CA074841 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
HAZARD REGRESSION AND OTHER POLYNOMIAL SPLINE METHODSR29CA074841 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 1998 to 2002
$351k
NCI NIH HHS CA 074841NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074841NCI NIH HHS R29 CA074841NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020688NIA NIH HHS R01AG020688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of disease-related genes in association studies is challenged by the large number of SNPs typed. To address the dilution of power caused by high dimensionality, and to generate results that are biologically interpretable, it is critical to take into consideration spatial correlation of SNPs along the genome. With the goal of identifying true genetic associations, partitioning the genome according to spatial correlation can be a powerful and meaningful way to address this dimensionality problem.

resultsWe developed and validated an MCMC Algorithm To Identify blocks of Linkage DisEquilibrium (MATILDE) for clustering contiguous SNPs, and a statistical testing framework to detect association using partitions as units of analysis. We compared its ability to detect true SNP associations to that of the most commonly used algorithm for block partitioning, as implemented in the Haploview and HapBlock software. Simulations were based on artificially assigning phenotypes to individuals with SNPs corresponding to region 14q11 of the HapMap database. When block partitioning is performed using MATILDE, the ability to correctly identify a disease SNP is higher, especially for small effects, than it is with the alternatives considered. Advantages can be both in terms of true positive findings and limiting the number of false discoveries. Finer partitions provided by LD-based methods or by marker-by-marker analysis are efficient only for detecting big effects, or in presence of large sample sizes. The probabilistic approach we propose offers several additional advantages, including: a) adapting the estimation of blocks to the population, technology, and sample size of the study; b) probabilistic assessment of uncertainty about block boundaries and about whether any two SNPs are in the same block; c) user selection of the probability threshold for assigning SNPs to the same block.

conclusionWe demonstrate that, in realistic scenarios, our adaptive, study-specific block partitioning approach is as or more efficient than currently available LD-based approaches in guiding the search for disease loci.

Indexed as

HaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanHumansLinkage DisequilibriumSoftware

Identifiers

PMID18759977
PMCPMC2547855
OpenAlexW1971943467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.