ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2008
Identification in daily practice of patients with Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer): revised Bethesda guidelines-based approach versus molecular screening.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Guideline
- Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors, third edition.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Guideline
- Comparison of universal screening in major lynch-associated tumors: a systematic review of literature.Familial cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Worldwide variation in lynch syndrome screening: case for universal screening in low colorectal cancer prevalence areas.Familial cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Guideline
- MLH1 promoter methylation frequency in colorectal cancer patients and related clinicopathological and molecular features.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Implementation of a Systematic Tumor Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome in an Integrated Health Care Setting.Familial cancer · 2019Trial
- A case of Lynch syndrome diagnosed after nine metachronous cancers detected over 35 years.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Review
- A paradigm shift in genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer: the impact of germline multigene panel testing on diagnosis and management.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after surgical resection of index rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.Surgery today · 2024Article
- Incorporating Immunotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: Molecular and Clinical Implications.Cancers · 2022Review
- Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Advances in genetic technologies result in improved diagnosis of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal and endometrial cancers.Journal of medical genetics · 2022Article
- Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- The viral expression and immune status in human cancers and insights into novel biomarkers of immunotherapy.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Implementation of Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening for Lynch Syndrome in Hispanics Living in Puerto Rico.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2021Article
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Development and external validation of a novel nomogram for screening Chinese Lynch syndrome: based on a multicenter, population study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2021Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of individuals who should undergo hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic testing remains a critical issue. The Bethesda guidelines were developed to preselect patients for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing before germline mutation screening. These criteria have been revised, and a new set of recommendations, the revised Bethesda guidelines, has been proposed.
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of these revised guidelines for identifying patients with HNPCC in a series of unselected consecutive patients and compare this revised guidelines-based approach with a molecular strategy (MSI testing for all tumors, followed by exclusion of MSI-positive sporadic cases from mutational testing). PATIENTS AND
methodsThe study included 214 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The MSI analysis was performed for all tumors. Germline testing, guided by immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair proteins, was performed for patients with MSI-positive tumors. Sporadic MSI-positive tumors were identified by screening for BRAF mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation.
resultsNinety patients (42.1%) met the revised guidelines. Twenty-one patients (9.8%) had MSI-positive tumors. Germline testing identified eight mutations (3.7%) (MSH2 N = 5, MLH1 N = 2, MSH6 N =1). The revised guidelines failed to identify 2 of the 8 probands (aged 67 and 81 yr, both with no family history). In contrast, the molecular strategy identified all patients requiring testing for germline mutation. The percentages of patients selected for germline testing by the revised guidelines and the molecular strategy were 4.2% and 5.1%, respectively.
conclusionsThe revised Bethesda guidelines did not identify all HNPCC cases in our series. The molecular approach identified all HNPCC patients with MSI-positive tumors, increasing the workload for germline testing only slightly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18759827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.