SynthesisDrug safety2008
Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second-generation antidepressants for preventing seasonal affective disorder in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Comparative benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies in initial treatment of major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Pooled it
- A review of the effectiveness of antidepressant medications for depressed nursing home residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2012Pooled it
- Changes in body weight and psychotropic drugs: a systematic synthesis of the literature.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Differences in efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical treatments between men and women: an umbrella review.PloS one · 2010Pooled it
- Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug safety · 2009Pooled it
- The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug safety · 2009Pooled it
- Effects of low-dose paroxetine 7.5 mg on weight and sexual function during treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2014Trial
- Possible etiology of improvements in both quality of life and overlapping gastroesophageal reflux disease by proton pump inhibitor treatment in a prospective randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2013Trial
- Functional electrical stimulation for major depressive disorder: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2026Article
- Unveiling the neuroprotective potential of Jatropha humboldtiana leaves and its metabolic profiling by UPLC-MS/MS.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- PET/CT study of dopamine transporter (DAT) binding with the triple reuptake inhibitor toludesvenlafaxine in rats and humans.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Adverse event profiles of drug-induced liver injury caused by antidepressant drugs: a disproportionality analysis.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Cool the Inflamed Brain: A Novel Anti-inflammatory Strategy for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- Weight-gain independent effect of mirtazapine on fasting plasma lipids in healthy men.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023Article
- OUTdoor Swimming as a nature-based Intervention for DEpression (OUTSIDE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised control trial comparing an outdoor swimming intervention to usual care for adults experiencing mild to moderate symptoms of depression.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- Adherence to, and Persistence of, Antidepressant Therapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a Population-based Study in Italy.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Article
- Liking of salt is associated with depression, anxiety, and stress.Chemical senses · 2023Article
- Alcohol-Related Liver Disease in the Covid-19 Era: Position Paper of the Italian Society on Alcohol (SIA).Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence indicates that only minor differences in efficacy exist among second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, a comprehensive assessment of both benefits and harms is crucial to evaluate the net benefit.
objectiveTo review systematically the comparative harms of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of MDD in adults by including both experimental and observational evidence. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychLit, The Cochrane Library and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to April 2007. We manually searched reference lists of pertinent review articles and explored the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research database to identify unpublished research. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible study designs were trials and observational studies comparing one drug of interest with another. DATA EXTRACTION: Two persons independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. One investigator extracted relevant data. A senior reviewer checked data for completeness and accuracy. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 104 experimental and observational studies. If data were sufficient, we conducted meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials on the relative risk of specific adverse events. Findings indicate that the spectrum of adverse events is similar. The frequency of specific adverse events, however, differed across drugs. Venlafaxine was associated with a significantly higher rate of nausea and vomiting than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Compared with other drugs, paroxetine frequently led to more sexual adverse effects and bupropion to fewer such effects; mirtazapine and paroxetine was associated with more weight gain and sertraline with a higher rate of diarrhoea. Overall, however, these differences did not lead to different discontinuation rates. The evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about rare but severe adverse events.
conclusionsAdverse event profiles are similar among second-generation antidepressants. However, different frequencies of specific adverse events might be clinically relevant and influence the choice of a treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.