Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18758747›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2008

Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

N B Lincoln, K A Radford, F L Game, W J Jeffcoate

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00729456 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Education in the Secondary Prevention of Foot Ulceration in Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2003 to 2006Enrolled172ConditionsFoot Ulceration in DiabetesArmsEducation
NCT04395521 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: A Feasibility Study in Canada

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelen ObilorRan2021 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsDiabetic Foot UlcerArmsDiabetic foot self-management support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Diabetes: foot ulcers and amputations.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N B LincolnInstitute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
K A Radford
F L Game
W J Jeffcoate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThis observer-blind, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effect of a foot care education programme in the secondary prevention of foot ulcers.

methodsPeople with newly healed foot ulcers attending one of three specialist clinics were allocated to receive either targeted, one-to-one education or usual care, using a computer-generated random allocation sequence that had been prepared in advance but which was concealed from the clinical researcher. The primary outcome was ulcer incidence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were ulcer incidence at 6 months and incidence of amputation, mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and quality of life (Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale) at 6 and 12 months. Protective foot care behaviours (Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare) were assessed at 12 months.

resultsThere were 87 (mean [SD] age 63.5 [12.1] years) patients in the intervention group and 85 control patients (mean [SD] age 64.9 [10.9] years). The groups were comparable at baseline. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between groups in ulcer incidence at either 6 months (intervention 30%, control 21%) or 12 months (intervention 41%, control 41%). Recommended foot care behaviours at 12 months were better in the intervention than in the control group (p = 0.03), but education had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on mood, quality of life or amputations. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationEven though the intervention was associated with improved foot care behaviour, there was no evidence that this programme of targeted education was associated with clinical benefit in this population when compared with usual care. The usefulness and optimal delivery of education to such a high-risk group requires further evaluation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00729456

fundingDiabetes UK project grant RD02/0002535.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAgedDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootDiabetic NephropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyEthnicityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.