Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18758682›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2009

[Stigma and taboo in dementia care - does continuing education for GPs and nurses contribute to destigmatisation].

H Kaduszkiewicz, I Röntgen, K Mossakowski, H van den Bussche

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Dementia in Germany: results of an interdisciplinary expert workshop].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2013
    Article
  7. Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H KaduszkiewiczUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Hamburg, Germany. kaduszki@uke.uni-hamburg.de
I Röntgen
K Mossakowski
H van den Bussche

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main reasons for deficits in the care of patients with dementia is the taboo on the disease and the stigma of the people suffering from the disease, also from the side of the professional caregivers. The aim of the project was to find out whether a continuing education program for GPs and for nurses in ambulatory care was able to increase the skills of professionals to better communicate with patients and relatives on the taboo topic of dementia. The program was developed with a multi-professional team and tested with 53 GPs and 54 nurses in ambulatory care. The evaluation was performed with a 39-item questionnaire administered before and after the training. Also, to test the stability of the outcomes, the same questionnaire was administered to the GPs after one year and after two months for the nurses. The process quality of the training was evaluated very positively in both groups. Outcome quality was also very positive. Many attitudes of the GPs changed in a positive way and this change was still present after one year. This was the case for their general attitude towards caring for people with dementia, their view on therapeutic possibilities, their willingness to support relatives, to refer them to the Alzheimer Society and to suggest to them participation in a self-help group. Results for the nurses pointed in the same direction. However, with regard to diagnosis disclosure and informing the patient, no effect of the training could be shown in the GP sample.

Indexed as

PrejudiceAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceDementiaEducation, Medical, ContinuingEducation, NursingFemaleGermanyHumansMalePhysicians, Family

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.