Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18757608›Full record

ArticleGenome research2008

Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training.

Vardges Ter-Hovhannisyan, Alexandre Lomsadze, Yury O Chernoff, Mark Borodovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 586 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
586citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

586 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Draft genome sequence of the basidiomycetous yeastMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The "dark magic mushroom" co-produces amatoxins and psilocybin.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomics meets metabolomics: decodingHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

526 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vardges Ter-HovhannisyanSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Alexandre Lomsadze
Yury O Chernoff
Mark Borodovsky

Funding

PREDICTION OF GENE LOCATIONS USING STOCHASTIC MODELSR01HG000783 · NHGRI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 1993 to 2014
$4.7M
GENETIC STUDY OF THE YEAST PRION INTERACTING PROTEINSR01GM058763 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CHERNOFF, YURY O · 1999 to 2010
$2.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG00783NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000783NIGMS NIH HHS GM58763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a new ab initio algorithm, GeneMark-ES version 2, that identifies protein-coding genes in fungal genomes. The algorithm does not require a predetermined training set to estimate parameters of the underlying hidden Markov model (HMM). Instead, the anonymous genomic sequence in question is used as an input for iterative unsupervised training. The algorithm extends our previously developed method tested on genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster. To better reflect features of fungal gene organization, we enhanced the intron submodel to accommodate sequences with and without branch point sites. This design enables the algorithm to work equally well for species with the kinds of variations in splicing mechanisms seen in the fungal phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota. Upon self-training, the intron submodel switches on in several steps to reach its full complexity. We demonstrate that the algorithm accuracy, both at the exon and the whole gene level, is favorably compared to the accuracy of gene finders that employ supervised training. Application of the new method to known fungal genomes indicates substantial improvement over existing annotations. By eliminating the effort necessary to build comprehensive training sets, the new algorithm can streamline and accelerate the process of annotation in a large number of fungal genome sequencing projects.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenes, FungalGenome, FungalPredictive Value of TestsExpressed Sequence TagsIntronsSequence Analysis, DNATeaching

Identifiers

PMID18757608
PMCPMC2593577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.