Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18757325›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2008

Patient education level as a predictor of survival in lung cancer clinical trials.

James E Herndon, Alice B Kornblith, Jimmie C Holland, Electra D Paskett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbances among patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of the impact of pain on overall survival in patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Educational attainment and employment status in lung cancer patients: a nationwide study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Statistical Inference for Cox Proportional Hazards Models with a Diverging Number of Covariates.Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James E HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. james.herndon@duke.edu
Alice B Kornblith
Jimmie C Holland
Electra D Paskett
The Ohio State University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

Cancer and Leukemia Group B - The Ohio State UniversityU10CA077658 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 1998 to 2013
$6.0M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA032291 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD J. · 1985 to 2013
$5.8M
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND CANCER AND ACUTE LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA077651 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI HUDIS, CLIFFORD A · 1998 to 2013
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA32291NCI NIH HHS CA77651NCI NIH HHS CA77658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the effect of socioeconomic status, as measured by education, on the survival of 1,577 lung cancer patients treated on 11 studies conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. PATIENTS AND

methodsSociodemographic data, including education, was reported by the patient at the time of clinical trial accrual. Cox proportional hazards model stratified by treatment arm/study was used to examine the effect of education on survival after adjustment for known prognostic factors.

resultsThe patient population included 1,177 patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; stage III or IV) and 400 patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC; extensive or limited). Patients with less than an eighth grade education (13% of patients) were significantly more likely to be male, nonwhite, and older; have a performance status (PS) of 1 or 2; and have chest pain. Significant predictors of poor survival in the final model included male sex, PS of 1 or 2, dyspnea, weight loss, liver or bone metastases, unmarried, presence of adrenal metastases and high alkaline phosphatase levels among patients with NSCLC, and high WBC levels among patients with advanced disease. Education was not predictive of survival.

conclusionThe physical condition of patients with low education who enroll onto clinical trials is worse than patients with higher education. Once enrolled onto a clinical trial, education does not affect the survival of patients with SCLC or stage III or IV NSCLC. The standardization of treatment and follow-up within a clinical trial, regardless of education, is one possible explanation for this lack of effect.

Indexed as

Educational StatusAdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSocial ClassTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18757325
PMCPMC2654374
OpenAlexW2123522715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.