Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18755999›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Effectiveness of topic-specific infobuttons: a randomized controlled trial.

Guilherme Del Fiol, Peter J Haug, James J Cimino, Scott P Narus, Chuck Norlin, Joyce A Mitchell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02922738 (The Impact of a Dermatology Information Source on Skin Problem Outcomes in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02922738 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of a Dermatology Information Source on Skin Problem Outcomes in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VermontRan2015 to 2016Enrolled465ConditionsDecision Support Systems,Clinical, Skin DiseasesArmsVisualDx
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Feeling and thinking: can theories of human motivation explain how EHR design impacts clinician burnout?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical management IT system for enhanced recovery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. guilherme.delfiol@utah.edu
Peter J Haug
James J Cimino
Scott P Narus
Chuck Norlin
Joyce A Mitchell

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
Infobuttons to Improve Information Access in Order EntryR01LM007593 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CIMINO, JAMES J. · 2002 to 2007
$2.4M
NLM NIH HHS 1T15LM007124-10NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007593NLM NIH HHS R01-LM07593NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInfobuttons are decision support tools that provide links within electronic medical record systems to relevant content in online information resources. The aim of infobuttons is to help clinicians promptly meet their information needs. The objective of this study was to determine whether infobutton links that direct to specific content topics ("topic links") are more effective than links that point to general overview content ("nonspecific links").

designRandomized controlled trial with a control and an intervention group. Clinicians in the control group had access to nonspecific links, while those in the intervention group had access to topic links. MEASUREMENTS: Infobutton session duration, number of infobutton sessions, session success rate, and the self-reported impact that the infobutton session produced on decision making.

resultsThe analysis was performed on 90 subjects and 3,729 infobutton sessions. Subjects in the intervention group spent 17.4% less time seeking for information (35.5 seconds vs. 43 seconds, p = 0.008) than those in the control group. Subjects in the intervention group used infobuttons 20.5% (22 sessions vs. 17.5 sessions, p = 0.21) more often than in the control group, but the difference was not significant. The information seeking success rate was equally high in both groups (89.4% control vs. 87.2% intervention, p = 0.99). Subjects reported a high positive clinical impact (i.e., decision enhancement or knowledge update) in 62% of the sessions. Limitations The exclusion of users with a low frequency of infobutton use and the focus on medication-related information needs may limit the generalization of the results. The session outcomes measurement was based on clinicians' self-assessment and therefore prone to bias.

conclusionThe results support the hypothesis that topic links are more efficient than nonspecific links regarding the time seeking for information. It is unclear whether the statistical difference demonstrated will result in a clinically significant impact. However, the overall results confirm previous evidence that infobuttons are effective at helping clinicians to answer questions at the point of care and demonstrate a modest incremental change in the efficiency of information delivery for routine users of this tool.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesUser-Computer InterfaceClinical MedicineHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPoint-of-Care Systems

Identifiers

PMID18755999
PMCPMC2585539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.