ArticleThe Journal of physiology2008
Electrophysiological events recorded at presynaptic terminals of the crayfish neuromuscular junction with a voltage indicator.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Focused ultrasound transiently increases membrane conductance in isolated crayfish axon.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- The Slow Depolarization Following Individual Spikes in Thin, Unmyelinated Axons in Mammalian Cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Resistance to action potential depression of a rat axon terminal in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Presynaptic resurgent Na+ currents sculpt the action potential waveform and increase firing reliability at a CNS nerve terminal.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The water-soluble voltage indicator JPW1114 was used to stain thin axons and terminal varicosities of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. A slow, overnight injection protocol was developed to brightly stain fine structures without cytotoxicity. Fluorescence transients filtered at 2 kHz showed that the duration of terminal action potentials was shorter than that of those recorded in the main trunk of the axons. In addition, the repolarization phases of the terminal and axonal action potentials overlapped in time, suggesting that the entire axonal arborization repolarizes simultaneously. Manipulating resting membrane potential, +/-15-20 mV, did not alter the peak level or duration of action potentials if they fired in isolation. A prolongation of action potential, by 23%, could be induced if a 10-spike burst at 100 Hz was fired from depolarized membrane potential. No such change was observed when the high frequency train was fired from resting or hyperpolarized levels. Microelectrodes in the main trunk of axons typically recorded a depolarizing after-potential (DAP) following an action potential initiated from resting membrane potential. The DAP could be inverted and enlarged by depolarization and hyperpolarization, respectively. Fluorescence transients recorded from terminals exhibited similar DAP characteristics. The ratio of DAP to action potential amplitude recorded from terminals was similar to that recorded from the main axon. Thus, the entire axonal arborization returned to resting level in a spatially uniform manner during the DAP. The functional significance of DAP is discussed in the light of these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.