Trial reportAtencion primaria2008
[Effectiveness of a therapeutic practice on overweight in primary care].
Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Energy2MOB study, group food education programme to reduce obesity in adults: randomised clinical trial protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention program on overweight to achieve a minimum decrease of 5% or a optimum of 10% of initial weight a year, and to identify the factors associated with slimming.
designRandomized controlled trial.
settingUrban health centre.
participantsOverweight subjects over 18 years old (n=169), wanting treatment or referred by their doctor. They were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=95) or control (n=70) group.
interventionsIntervention group: yearly program with consultations every 15-21 days, using a low calorie diet, prescribing physical exercise, changing of habits and health education. CONTROL GROUP: low calorie diet, seen 3 times/year.
resultsThe minimum weight loss was achieved in 6 months by 37.9% of the intervention group and by 21.4% of the control group. At one year, 45.3% of the intervention subjects and 24.3% of the control group reached this objective. The optimum loss of 10% was higher in the intervention group, but was not statistically significant. The minimum objective was associated with the intervention group (OR=4.5 [1.36-14.49]). It was also associated to the number of visits during therapy (OR=1.85 [1.50-2.29]) and diabetes (OR=10 [1.13-90.9]).
conclusionsThe intervention group had a loss of 5% of initial weight in the first 6 months, 16.5% more than the control group, and 21% more in one year. Achieving the minimum objective was associated with the intervention group, the number of visits and the diagnosis of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.