Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18754813›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2008

Stemming heart failure with cardiac- or reprogrammed-stem cells.

Kento Tateishi, Naofumi Takehara, Hiroaki Matsubara, Hidemasa Oh

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01273857 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Phase I Study of Cardiac Progenitor Cell Therapy in Patients With Single Ventricle Physiology

TypeinterventionalSponsorOkayama UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled14ConditionsHypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Single Ventricle, Heart FailureArmsAutologous cardiac progenitor cell transplantation, staged shunt procedure
NCT01829750 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Phase 2 Study of Intracoronary Infusion of Cardiac Progenitor Cells in Patients With Univentricular Heart Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorOkayama UniversityRan2013 to 2016Enrolled34ConditionsHypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Single Right Ventricle, Single Left VentricleArmsCardiac progenitor cell infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Preconditioning and stem cell survival.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2010
    Review
  13. Cardiogenesis: an embryological perspective.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stem cell therapy - Hype or hope? A review.Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD · 2009
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kento TateishiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, Translational Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naofumi Takehara
Hiroaki Matsubara
Hidemasa Oh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive efforts to control myocyte growth by genetic targeting of the cell cycle machinery and small molecules for cardiac repair, adult myocytes themselves appeared to divide a limited number of times in response to a variety of cardiac muscle stresses. Rare tissue-resident stem cells are thought to exist in many adult organs that are capable of self-renewal and differentiation and possess a range of actions that are potentially therapeutic. Recent studies suggest that a population of cardiac stem cells (CSCs) is maintained after cardiac development in the adult heart in mammals including human beings; however, homeostatic cardiomyocyte replacement might be stem cell-dependent, and functional myocardial regeneration after cardiac muscle damage is not yet considered as sufficient to fully maintain or reconstitute the cardiovascular system and function. Although it is clear that adult CSCs have limitations in their capabilities to proliferate extensively and differentiate in response to injury in vivo for replenishing mature car-diomyocytes and potentially function as resident stem cells. Transplantation of CSCs expanded ex vivo seems to require an integrated strategy of cell growth-enhancing factor(s) and tissue engineering technologies to support the donor cell survival and subsequent proliferation and differentiation in the host microenvironment. There has been substantial interest regarding the evidence that mammalian fibroblasts can be genetically reprogrammed to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, which closely resemble embryonic stem (ES) cell properties capable of differentiating into functional cardiomyocytes, and these cells may provide an alternative cell source for generating patient-specific CSCs for therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHeart FailureHumansMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationSignal TransductionStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID18754813
PMCPMC4514101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.