ArticleCurrent osteoporosis reports2008
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty update.
Article in Current osteoporosis reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures in which a filler material is percutaneously injected into a vertebral body for the treatment of vertebral fractures associated with osteoporosis, malignant conditions, hemangiomas, and osteonecrosis. In vertebroplasty, the filler is injected directly into the bone, whereas in kyphoplasty, the filler is injected into a cavity created by inflation of a balloon tamp. The goals of treatment include pain relief, fracture stabilization, restoration of vertebral height, and strengthening of the vertebral body to reduce the risk of a future fracture at the same level. When performed by a well-trained physician in appropriately selected patients, vertebral augmentation is usually effective in achieving one or more of these goals, with a generally good short-term safety profile. Although these procedures hold great promise in the management of vertebral fractures, many questions about long-term efficacy and safety remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.