Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18752771›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2008

Management of osteoporosis in geriatric populations.

Diane L Schneider

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatial variation in osteonal bone properties relative to tissue and animal age.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diane L SchneiderUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. dlschneider@ucsd.edu
University of California System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of osteoporotic fractures increases with advancing age and is associated with significant health care expenditures, particularly related to hip fractures and loss of quality of life. Unfortunately, few studies have included subjects 80 years of age and older to help guide management of elderly patients who are living in the community or in long-term care facilities. Treating this age group encompasses the same general measures and pharmacologic therapies as in younger adults. Focusing on fall prevention and adequate vitamin D is essential. All prevention strategies in the elderly for fracture risk reduction should include simple vitamin D and calcium supplementation. However, for those at high risk of fracture, adding pharmacologic therapy should be considered. This article reviews recent research findings of general measures and pharmacologic therapy that are applicable to managing osteoporosis in the elderly.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcium, DietaryDiphosphonatesFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleOsteoporosisSpinal InjuriesVitamin DBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcium, DietaryDiphosphonatesVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID18752771
OpenAlexW1975743196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.