Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18752636›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2009

CD34+ cells augment endothelial cell differentiation of CD14+ endothelial progenitor cells in vitro.

G Krenning, B W A van der Strate, M Schipper, X J Gallego Y van Seijen, B C A Fernandes, M J A van Luyn, M C Harmsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Resident vascular Sca1iScience · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endothelial progenitor cells in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction in patients with progressive chronic kidney disease.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2009 · on this map
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G KrenningStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
B W A van der StrateStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
M SchipperStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
X J Gallego Y van SeijenStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
B C A FernandesMedtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M J A van LuynStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
M C HarmsenStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dept. Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLMedtronic (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neovascularization by endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) for the treatment of ischaemic diseases has been a topic of intense research. The CD34(+) cell is often designated as EPC, because it contributes to repair of ischaemic injuries through neovascularization. However, incorporation of CD34(+) cells into the neovasculature is limited, suggesting another role which could be paracrine. CD14(+) cells can also differentiate into endothelial cells and contribute to neovascularization. However, the low proliferative capacity of CD14(+) cell-derived endothelial cells hampers their use as therapeutic cells. We made the assumption that an interaction between CD34(+) and CD14(+) cells augments endothelial differentiation of the CD14(+) cells. In vitro, the influence of CD34(+) cells on the endothelial differentiation capacity of CD14(+) cells was investigated. Endothelial differentiation was analysed by expression of endothelial cell markers CD31, CD144, von Willebrand Factor and endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase. Furthermore, we assessed proliferative capacity and endothelial cell function of the cells in culture. In monocultures, 63% of the CD14(+)-derived cells adopted an endothelial cell phenotype, whereas in CD34(+)/CD14(+) co-cultures 95% of the cells showed endothelial cell differentiation. Proliferation increased up to 12% in the CD34(+)/CD14(+) co-cultures compared to both monocultures. CD34-conditioned medium also increased endothelial differentiation of CD14(+) cells. This effect was abrogated by hepatocyte growth factor neutralizing antibodies, but not by interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 neutralizing antibodies. We show that co-culturing of CD34(+) and CD14(+) cells results in a proliferating population of functional endothelial cells, which may be suitable for treatment of ischaemic diseases such as myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD34Cell DifferentiationCoculture TechniquesCulture Media, ConditionedEndothelium, VascularHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsStem CellsAntigens, CD34Culture Media, ConditionedLipopolysaccharide Receptors

Identifiers

PMID18752636
PMCPMC6512353
OpenAlexW2122498043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.