Trial reportPharmacotherapy2008
Reduction in adverse symptoms as blood pressure becomes controlled.
Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Similar blood pressure values across racial and economic groups: baseline data from a group randomized clinical trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013Trial
- Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension and reduction in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures.Archives of internal medicine · 2010Trial
- Effect of self-efficacy and social support on adherence to antihypertensive drugs.Pharmacotherapy · 2010Trial
- Physician and pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.Archives of internal medicine · 2009Trial
- A De Novo Pharmacist-Family Physician Collaboration Model in a Family Medicine Clinic in Alberta, Canada.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Avoiding Pitfalls With Implementation of Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials: Strategies to Achieve Milestones.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesTo evaluate trends in adverse symptoms as blood pressure becomes controlled, and to determine if these symptoms are influenced by social support and self-efficacy.
designSecondary analysis from a randomized controlled study of physician-pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.
settingFive university-affiliated primary care clinics. PATIENTS: A total of 179 patients (aged 21-85 yrs) with uncontrolled primary hypertension who were taking no antihypertensive drugs or up to three antihypertensive drugs at baseline were randomized to the intervention group, in which pharmacists were involved in their care, or to the control group, who received usual care from their physicians. Of these patients, 160 completed the study: 92 were in the intervention group, and 68 were in the control group.
interventionIn both groups, patient-reported symptoms suggestive of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded at each study visit with use of a structured ADR questionnaire. Social support and self-efficacy questionnaires were also administered at each study visit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsPatients' ADR scores decreased significantly from baseline to the end of the study in both the control (from a mean of 26.5 to 18.4) and intervention (from 29.9 to 22.7) groups (p<0.0001 for both comparisons), although no significant difference was noted between groups. The mean +/- SD number of antihypertensive drugs/patient increased in both the intervention (from 1.5 +/- 1.0 to 2.4 +/- 0.9 drugs) and control (from 1.4 +/- 1.0 to 1.9 +/- 1.0 drugs) groups; however, the difference between groups was significant only at the end of the study. Additional analyses were performed on self-efficacy and social support to determine a potential reason for the reduction in ADR scores despite an increase in drug use. Improvements in self-efficacy and social support scores were significantly and independently associated with improvement in ADR score (p<0.05).
conclusionsIn both groups, ADR scores improved despite an increase in antihypertensive drug use. Improvements in social support and, to a lesser extent, self-efficacy were associated with improvements in ADR scores. Patients should not expect an increase in distressful symptoms as their blood pressure becomes controlled with antihypertensive drugs, especially when adequate social support is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.