Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18751930›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2009

Medical treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a role for novel bile acids and other (post-)transcriptional modulators?

Ulrich Beuers, Gerd A Kullak-Ublick, Thomas Pusl, Erik R Rauws, Christian Rust

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bile acids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Crosstalk of liver, bile ducts and the gut.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulrich BeuersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, G4-213, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P. O. Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. u.h.beuers@amc.uv.nl
Gerd A Kullak-Ublick
Thomas Pusl
Erik R Rauws
Christian Rust
Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht · DEAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare chronic cholestatic disease of the liver and bile ducts that is associated with inflammatory bowel disease, generally leads to end-stage liver disease, and is complicated by malignancies of the biliary tree and the large intestine. The pathogenesis of PSC remains enigmatic, making the development of targeted therapeutic strategies difficult. Immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapeutic agents were ineffective or accompanied by major side effects. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has consistently been shown to improve serum liver tests and might lower the risk of colon carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma by yet unknown mechanisms. Whether "high dose" UDCA improves the long-term prognosis in PSC as suggested by small pilot trials remains to be demonstrated. The present overview discusses potential therapeutic options aside of targeted immunological therapies and UDCA. The C23 bile acid norUDCA has been shown to markedly improve biochemical and histological features in a mouse model of sclerosing cholangitis without any toxic effects. Studies in humans are eagerly being awaited. Nuclear receptors like the farnesoid-X receptor (FXR), pregnane-X receptor (PXR), vitamin D receptor (VDR), and peroxisome-proliferator-activator receptors (PPARs) have been shown to induce expression of diverse carriers and biotransformation enzymes of the intestinal and hepatic detoxification machinery and/or to modulate fibrogenesis. Pros and cons of respective receptor agonists for the future treatment of PSC are discussed in detail. In our view, the novel bile acid norUDCA and agonists of PPARs, VDR, and PXR appear particularly attractive for further studies in PSC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholangitis, SclerosingDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansLigandsMicePeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPregnane X ReceptorReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, SteroidTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticUrsodeoxycholic AcidDNA-Binding ProteinsLigandsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPregnane X ReceptorReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, SteroidTranscription FactorsUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18751930
OpenAlexW1985189453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.