Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18751901›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2008

Drug absorption modeling as a tool to define the strategy in clinical formulation development.

Martin Kuentz

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Colloidal stability of polymeric nanoparticles in biological fluids.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin KuentzUniversity of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Institute of Pharma Technology, Gründenstr., 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland. martin.kuentz@fhnw.ch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this mini review is to discuss the use of physiologically-based drug absorption modeling to guide the formulation development. Following an introduction to drug absorption modeling, this article focuses on the preclinical formulation development. Case studies are presented, where the emphasis is not only the prediction of absolute exposure values, but also their change with altered input values. Sensitivity analysis of technologically relevant parameters, like the drug's particle size, dose and solubility, is presented as the basis to define the clinical formulation strategy. Taking the concept even one step further, the article shows how the entire design space for drug absorption can be constructed. This most accurate prediction level is mainly foreseen once clinical data is available and an example is provided using mefenamic acid as a model drug. Physiologically-based modeling is expected to be more often used by formulators in the future. It has the potential to become an indispensable tool to guide the formulation development of challenging drugs, which will help minimize both risks and costs of formulation development.

Indexed as

Drug DesignModels, BiologicalPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsAbsorptionAnimalsBiological AvailabilityBiopharmaceuticsDrug IndustryHumansPermeabilityPharmacology, ClinicalPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18751901
PMCPMC2621306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.