ReviewDrugs & aging2008
Transdermal delivery of treatment for Alzheimer's disease: development, clinical performance and future prospects.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Donepezil Transdermal Delivery System with Oral Donepezil.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Trial
- Single dose pharmacokinetics of the novel transdermal donepezil patch in healthy volunteers.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Trial
- Current and Future Nano-Carrier-Based Approaches in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Preparation and Characterization of Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch Based on Chitosan Microparticles.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2016Article
- Transdermal donepezil on the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2012Article
- Alzheimer's Disease: Differences of Transdermal versus Oral Treatment on Caregiving Time.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the potential of transdermal drug delivery systems for the treatment of neurological disorders, especially in the elderly. In this population, the higher incidence of chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, neurological disease and chronic pain, has dramatically increased the need for long-term medications. Additionally, elderly patients often have a combination of several chronic diseases, meaning drug delivery, drug-drug interactions, absorption/blood concentrations, toxicity and compliance are of concern for patients as well as for their caregivers and physicians. Recent efforts have focused on developing pharmaceutical preparations that overcome these issues. For example, rate-controlled drug delivery systems have been under active development. Transdermal drug delivery systems have been developed to deliver phenserine, rivastigmine, nicotine and estradiol for the management of cognitive and behavioural dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's disease because this form of administration has several advantages, including maintenance of sustained therapeutic plasma concentrations of drugs, easy application and reduced systemic adverse effects. Thus, transdermal drug delivery for elderly patients offers promise as the ideal therapeutic approach to treating Alzheimer's disease.This article reviews the technical principles underlying the development of transdermal drug delivery systems, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors, and the prospects for future development. The clinical performance of transdermal patches, again with emphasis on cholinesterase inhibitors, is also reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.