Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18729545›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2008

What defines abnormal lung function in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Nitin Y Bhatt, Karen L Wood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Challenges of Spirometric Diagnosis of COPD.Canadian respiratory journal · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Diagnosis of airway obstruction in the elderly: contribution of the SARA study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nitin Y BhattOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Karen L Wood

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a very common lung disease most often related to a history of smoking. It becomes more prevalent with increasing age but remains under-diagnosed and under-treated in the elderly population. The Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) programme has been instrumental in providing standard diagnostic criteria as well as recommendations for prevention and management of COPD. GOLD recommendations define COPD as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%, with the severity based on the value of FEV(1). This recommendation is different from that of many previous reports that have recommended diagnosing obstruction using the statistically derived lower limit of normal (LLN), which varies for each person according to age, height, ethnicity and gender. While the use of a 70% ratio may be simpler, it may result in under-diagnosis of airflow obstruction in younger people and over-diagnosis in the elderly. This is particularly important as the elderly may be most sensitive to many of the adverse effects of medications used in the treatment of COPD, including corticosteroids and anticholinergic bronchodilators.Most of the studies comparing the LLN and a fixed ratio of 70% have not been performed with post-bronchodilator testing as recommended by GOLD. Generation of post-bronchodilator reference sets and studies comparing the LLN with the post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC ratio of <70% will help resolve this issue. One recent study examined patients admitted to hospitals who had an FEV(1)/FVC ratio of <70% but above the LLN, and found they were at increased risk of death and COPD complications. This would support the use of GOLD criteria. Further studies examining this population are needed.In addition to the uncertainties about what diagnostic criteria should be utilized for diagnosis of airflow obstruction, different organizations make different recommendations on screening spirometry. A conservative recommendation is to perform spirometry in symptomatic individuals. It is important to remember that while COPD is under-diagnosed in the elderly, this group is also at a higher risk of being falsely classified as having airflow obstruction using the 70% ratio recommended by GOLD. This can result in unnecessary use of medications and increased risk of adverse effects to which the elderly are more prone.

Indexed as

AgedAgingBronchodilator AgentsClinical Trials as TopicForced Expiratory VolumeHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReference ValuesRespiratory Function TestsSeverity of Illness IndexSpirometryVital CapacityBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.