Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18728744›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2008

Review of the clinical evidence for interferon beta 1a (Rebif) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Francesco Manfredonia, Livia Pasquali, Angela Dardano, Alfonso Iudice, Luigi Murri, Fabio Monzani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01112345 (A Multicentre, Non Interventional, Non Randomized, Observational Study for the Assessment of Compliance and Persistence With Rebif® Therapy of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis as Well as for the Evaluation of Potential Factors Influencing These Parameters, in Real Life Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01112345 completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

A Multicentre, Non Interventional, Non Randomized, Observational Study for the Assessment of Compliance and Persistence With Rebif® Therapy of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis as Well as for the Evaluation of Potential Factors Influencing These Parameters, in Real Life Clinical Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyRan2009 to 2012Enrolled133ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis in Latin America.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco ManfredoniaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pisa Pisa, Italy.
Livia Pasquali
Angela Dardano
Alfonso Iudice
Luigi Murri
Fabio Monzani
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interferon (INF) beta 1a 22 or 44 mug (Rebif((R))) administered s.c. 3 times a week (t.i.w) is a well established immunomodulating treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This review focuses on its mechanisms of action, evidence of efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Several pharmacodynamic properties explain the immunomodulatory actions of INF beta 1a 22 or 44 mug s.c. t.i.w. Pivotal trials and post-marketing studies proved that the drug is effective in reducing disease activity and likely in slowing disease progression. Head-to-head comparative studies with other marketed INFs beta in RRMS suggested a better therapeutic response associated with higher doses and frequency of administration of Rebif((R)). Additional evidence indicated a beneficial effect of INF beta 1a in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) suggestive of MS, as treatment reduced time to conversion to clinically definite (CD) disease. Further, although the drug did not prove to slow time to progression there were benefits on relapse- and MRI-related secondary outcome measures in secondary progressive (SP) MS. Pivotal trials, their cross-over extensions, and post-marketing studies consistently showed that INF beta 1a 22 or 44 mug s.c. t.i.w. is safe and well tolerated, as adverse drug reactions are usually mild and manageable.

Indexed as

clinical trialsinterferon β 1amultiple sclerosispost-marketing studiesreview

Identifiers

PMID18728744
PMCPMC2518386
OpenAlexW2085723112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.