ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2008
Critical appraisal of medical devices in the management of cerebrovascular disease.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical devices may revolutionize the management of acute ischemic stroke and prevention of recurrent events. By comparison with pharmaceuticals, the device approval process and subsequent application of these devices in stroke treatment is founded on a paucity of Class I evidence-based clinical trial data. Thromboembolectomy for acute stroke, stenting of cervical or cerebral arteries for stroke prevention, and percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for prevention or recurrent cerebral ischemia are being done with an ever-increasing frequency despite few, if any, randomized clinical trials to confirm the appropriateness of the interventions. The current basis, or lack thereof, for these interventions for cerebrovascular disease is therefore discussed. As such, a critical appraisal of the available clinical data does not support widespread use of medical devices at this time outside of well-designed clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.