Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18728665›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2008

Mage-b vaccine delivered by recombinant Listeria monocytogenes is highly effective against breast cancer metastases.

S H Kim, F Castro, D Gonzalez, P C Maciag, Y Paterson, C Gravekamp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HarnessingArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Review
  6. Preliminary Exploration ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Living Bacteria: A New Vehicle for Vaccine Delivery in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Science translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S H KimCalifornia Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, 475 Brannan Street, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
F Castro
D Gonzalez
P C Maciag
Y Paterson
C Gravekamp
California Pacific Medical Center · USAdvaxis (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

DNA vaccines for metastatic breat cancer at old ageR01AG023096 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI GRAVEKAMP, CLAUDIA · 2004 to 2010
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS 1R01 AG023096-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapies are needed that target breast cancer metastases. In previous studies, we have shown that vaccination with pcDNA3.1-Mage-b DNA vaccine is effective against breast cancer metastases. In the study presented here, we have further enhanced the efficacy of Mage-b vaccination through the improved delivery of the vaccine using recombinant Listeria monocytogenes (LM). Three overlapping fragments of Mage-b as well as the complete protein-encoding region of Mage-b have been expressed as a fusion protein with a truncated non-cytolytic form of listeriolysin O (LLO) in recombinant LM. These different Mage-b vaccine strains were preventively tested for their efficacy against breast cancer metastases in a syngeneic mouse tumour model 4T1. The LM-LLO-Mage-b/2nd, expressing position 311-660 of the cDNA of Mage-b, was the most effective vaccine strain against metastases in the 4T1 mouse breast tumour model. Vaccination with LM-LLO-Mage-b/2nd dramatically reduced the number of metastases by 96% compared with the saline group and by 88% compared with the vector control group (LM-LLO), and this correlated with strong Mage-b-specific CD8 T-cell responses in the spleen, after restimulation with Mage-b. However, no effect of LM-LLO-Mage-b/2nd was observed on 4T1 primary tumours, which may be the result of a complete absence of Mage-b-specific immune responses in the draining lymph nodes. Vaccination with LM-LLO-Mage-b/2nd could be an excellent follow-up after removal of the primary tumour, to eliminate metastases and residual tumour cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBase SequenceCancer VaccinesCell Line, TumorDNA PrimersFemaleListeria monocytogenesMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm ProteinsRecombination, GeneticReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTreatment OutcomeAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesDNA PrimersMageb1 protein, mouseMageb2 protein, mouseNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18728665
PMCPMC2528142
OpenAlexW2010656074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.