Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18727823›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2008

Ultra-brief intervention for problem drinkers: research protocol.

John A Cunningham, Clayton Neighbors, Cameron Wild, Keith Humphreys

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00688584 (Ultra-brief Intervention for Problem Drinkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00688584 nacompletednot on this map

Ultra-brief Intervention for Problem Drinkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2008 to 2010Enrolled1,767ConditionsProblem Drinking, AlcoholismArmsPamphlet-based personalized alcohol feedback (PAF), control pamphlet condition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Who uses online interventions for problem drinkers?Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2011
    Trial
  6. Event-specific drinking in the general population.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John A CunninghamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada. john_cunningham@camh.net
Clayton Neighbors
Cameron Wild
Keith Humphreys
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Ultra-brief intervention for problem drinkersR01AA015680 · NIAAA · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI CUNNINGHAM, JOHN A · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015680NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015680-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelping the large number of problem drinkers who will never seek treatment is a challenging issue. Public health initiatives employing educational materials or mass media campaigns have met with mixed success. However, clinical research has developed effective brief interventions to help problem drinkers. This project will employ an intervention that has been validated in clinical settings and then modified into an ultra-brief format suitable for use as a public health intervention. The major objective of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial to establish the effectiveness of an ultra-brief, personalized feedback intervention for problem drinkers. METHODS/

designProblem drinkers recruited on a baseline population telephone survey conducted in a major metropolitan city in Canada will be randomized to one of three conditions - a personalized feedback pamphlet condition, a control pamphlet condition, or a no intervention control condition. In the week after the baseline survey, households in the two pamphlet conditions will be sent their respective pamphlets. Changes in drinking will be assessed post intervention at three-month and six-month follow-ups. Drinking outcomes will be compared between experimental conditions using Structural Equation Modeling. The primary hypothesis is that problem drinkers from households who receive the personalized feedback pamphlet intervention will display significantly improved drinking outcomes at three and six-month follow-ups as compared to problem drinkers from households in the no intervention control condition. Secondary hypotheses will test the impact of the intervention on help seeking, and explore the mediating or moderating role of perceived drinking norms, perceived alcohol risks and the problem drinker's social reasons for drinking. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide information on the effectiveness of a pamphlet-based personalized feedback intervention for problem drinkers in a community setting.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration #NCT00688584.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAdultAlcoholismBehavior TherapyCanadaFeedbackFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleOntarioOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePamphletsResearch DesignSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID18727823
PMCPMC2528012
OpenAlexW2147703586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.