Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18727689›Full record

SynthesisActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2008

Long-term antidepressant treatment in bipolar disorder: meta-analyses of benefits and risks.

S N Ghaemi, A P Wingo, M A Filkowski, R J Baldessarini

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Depression and Suicidality Outcomes in the Treatment of Early Age Mania Study.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2015
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar depression: commentary.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bipolar depression: a major unsolved challenge.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Risk of manic switch with antidepressants use in patients with bipolar disorder in a Nigerian neuropsychiatric hospital.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S N GhaemiMood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA. nghaemi@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
A P Wingo
M A Filkowski
R J Baldessarini
Emory University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Long-term antidepressant outcome in bipolar depressionK23MH064189 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GHAEMI, NASSIR · 2001 to 2005
$843k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH064189NIMH NIH HHS MH-64189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLong-term antidepressant (AD) treatment for depression in bipolar disorder (BPD) patients is highly prevalent, but its benefits and risks remain uncertain, encouraging this meta-analysis of available research.

methodWe reviewed randomized controlled trials for BPD involving >or=6 months of treatment with AD +/- mood stabilizer (MS) vs. placebo +/- MS, using meta-analyses to compare reported risks of new depression vs. mania.

resultsIn seven trials (350 BPD patients) involving 12 contrasts, long-term treatments that included ADs yielded 27% lower risk of new depression vs. MS-only or no treatment [pooled relative risk, RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.97; number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 11], but 72% greater risk for new mania [RR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.23-2.41; number-needed-to-harm (NNH) = 7]. Compared with giving an MS-alone, adding an AD yielded neither major protection from depression (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.56-1.27; NNT = 16) nor substantial increase in risk of mania (RR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.81-2.33; NNH = 16).

conclusionLong-term adjunctive AD treatment was not superior to MS-alone in BPD, further encouraging reliance on MSs as the cornerstone of prophylaxis.

Indexed as

AdultAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLong-Term CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk AssessmentAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18727689
PMCPMC2718794
OpenAlexW2085271951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.