Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18726880›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2008

Occupational allergy and asthma among salt water fish processing workers.

Mohamed F Jeebhay, Thomas G Robins, Mary E Miller, Eric Bateman, Marius Smuts, Roslynn Baatjies, Andreas L Lopata

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Relationship between Serum Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Asthma Endpoints.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  9. Food Allergy and Asthma: Is There a Link?Current treatment options in allergy · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food allergy in Africa: myth or reality?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  13. Fish allergy: in review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A contemporary review of seafood allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed F JeebhayOccupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. mohamed.jeebhay@uct.ac.za
Thomas G Robins
Mary E Miller
Eric Bateman
Marius Smuts
Roslynn Baatjies
Andreas L Lopata
University of Cape Town · ZAMarymount University · USRMIT University · AUSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUnited States Department of Labor · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN SOUTH AFRICAD43TW000812 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINS, THOMAS G · 1996 to 2011
$2.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000812PHS HHS R01 F002304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFish processing is a common economic activity in Southern Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and host determinants of allergic symptoms, allergic sensitization, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and asthma among workers processing saltwater fish.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 594 currently employed workers in two processing plants involved in pilchard canning and fishmeal processing. A modified European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire was used. Skin prick tests (SPT) used extracts of common airborne allergens, fresh fish (pilchard, anchovy, maasbanker, mackerel, red eye) and fishmeal. Spirometry and methacholine challenge tests (MCTs; tidal breathing method) used ATS guidelines.

resultsWork-related ocular-nasal symptoms (26%) were more common than asthma symptoms (16%). The prevalence of atopy was 36%, while 7% were sensitized to fish species and 26% had NSBH (PC(20) < or = 8 mg/ml or > or =12% increase in FEV(1) post-bronchodilator). The prevalence of probable occupational asthma was 1.8% and fish allergic rhino-conjunctivitis 2.6%. Women were more likely to report work-related asthma symptoms (OR = 1.94) and have NSBH (OR = 3.09), while men were more likely to be sensitized to fish (OR = 2.06) and have airway obstruction (OR = 4.17). Atopy (OR = 3.16) and current smoking (OR = 2.37), but not habitual seafood consumption were associated with sensitization to fish.

conclusionsBased on comparison with previous published studies, the prevalence of occupational asthma to salt water fish is lower than due to shellfish. The gendered distribution of work and exposures in fish processing operations together with atopy and cigarette smoking are important determinants of occupational allergy and asthma.

Indexed as

FisheriesAdultAge DistributionAnimalsAsthmaBronchial HyperreactivityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood HandlingHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID18726880
PMCPMC2834300
OpenAlexW2106104066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.