ArticleInfection2008
A point-prevalence study for MRSA in a German university hospital to identify patients at risk and to evaluate an established admission screening procedure.
Article in Infection, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at time of hospital or intensive care unit admission.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2013Pooled it
- Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Pooled it
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in cardiovascular surgery patients at a university hospital in Bogotá, ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2020Article
- Distribution of the Most PrevalentFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Article
- A trial of discontinuation of empiric vancomycin therapy in patients with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health care-associated pneumonia.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- The current role of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) typing and the retrospective identification of outbreaks.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2012Article
- The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Germany.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Review
- MRSA prevalence in European healthcare settings: a review.BMC infectious diseases · 2011Review
- [Strategies to prevent surgical site infections].Der Unfallchirurg · 2011Article
- Pre-Operative Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection: A Review of the Clinical-Effectiveness and Guidelines.CADTH technology overviews · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the enormous increase in the number of MRSA-patients, in July 2004, an extended admission screening protocol was implemented in ICUs and surgical wards at Hannover Medical School. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn 2005, a point-prevalence study (also known as a cross-sectional study) was conducted to determine the prevalence of MRSA and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) among inpatients, to identify patients at risk for MRSA colonization and to evaluate compliance with admission screening. Inpatients were screened by taking cultures from nose, throat and skin lesions. S. aureus isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and PVL. MRSA was analyzed by staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing.
resultsOf 509 inpatients, 145 (28%) were S. aureus carriers. 27 (19%) inpatients were MRSA positive, i.e., the MRSA point-prevalence was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.49; 7.70). spa type t032 was predominant in 67% of the MRSA inpatients. The PVL gene was present in one (0.2%) methicillin-susceptible strain. Comparison with data retrieved from the local hospital MRSA database showed that, the status of 37% of the MRSA had previously remained undetected (10/27). Consequently, MRSA colonization was newly identified in 2.0% (10/509) of the patients. Compliance with admission screening failed in three cases. Nosocomial acquisition was identified in three patients. Four other patients harbouring MRSA were newly identified on wards without routine screening (three neurological, one internal medicine ward).
conclusionDespite extended admission screening, 37% of all MRSA-positive inpatients were missed. The neurological patients were identified as a further risk group and were included in the admission screening procedure established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18726552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.