Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18726552›Full record

ArticleInfection2008

A point-prevalence study for MRSA in a German university hospital to identify patients at risk and to evaluate an established admission screening procedure.

Iris F Chaberny, A Bindseil, D Sohr, P Gastmeier

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Distribution of the Most PrevalentFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iris F ChabernyInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. chaberny.iris@mh-hannover.de
A Bindseil
D Sohr
P Gastmeier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the enormous increase in the number of MRSA-patients, in July 2004, an extended admission screening protocol was implemented in ICUs and surgical wards at Hannover Medical School. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn 2005, a point-prevalence study (also known as a cross-sectional study) was conducted to determine the prevalence of MRSA and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) among inpatients, to identify patients at risk for MRSA colonization and to evaluate compliance with admission screening. Inpatients were screened by taking cultures from nose, throat and skin lesions. S. aureus isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and PVL. MRSA was analyzed by staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing.

resultsOf 509 inpatients, 145 (28%) were S. aureus carriers. 27 (19%) inpatients were MRSA positive, i.e., the MRSA point-prevalence was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.49; 7.70). spa type t032 was predominant in 67% of the MRSA inpatients. The PVL gene was present in one (0.2%) methicillin-susceptible strain. Comparison with data retrieved from the local hospital MRSA database showed that, the status of 37% of the MRSA had previously remained undetected (10/27). Consequently, MRSA colonization was newly identified in 2.0% (10/509) of the patients. Compliance with admission screening failed in three cases. Nosocomial acquisition was identified in three patients. Four other patients harbouring MRSA were newly identified on wards without routine screening (three neurological, one internal medicine ward).

conclusionDespite extended admission screening, 37% of all MRSA-positive inpatients were missed. The neurological patients were identified as a further risk group and were included in the admission screening procedure established.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsCarrier StateCross-Sectional StudiesExotoxinsFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHospitals, UniversityHumansLeukocidinsMaleMass ScreeningMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPatient AdmissionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsExotoxinsLeukocidinsPanton-Valentine leukocidin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.