ReviewMedical care2008
Implications of new colorectal cancer screening technologies for primary care practice.
Review in Medical care, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of a multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries.PloS one · 2019Article
- Colorectal cancer screening in an equal access healthcare system.Journal of Cancer · 2013Article
- Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?BMC public health · 2010Review
- Article
- Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision MakingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.