Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18724308›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2008

Why are there regional differences in stem cell transplantation activity? An EBMT analysis.

A Gratwohl, H Baldomero, K Frauendorfer, D Niederwieser, Joint Accreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy ISCT, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation EMBT (JACIE)

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trends of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Eastern Mediterranean region, 1984-2007.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A GratwohlDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. hematology@uhbs.ch
H Baldomero
K Frauendorfer
D Niederwieser
Joint Accreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy ISCT
European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation EMBT (JACIE)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the number of hematopoietic SCTs (HSCT), in transplant rates, in indications and in techniques between countries have been reported. They were attributed mainly to differences in the economic situation of the countries or to differences in prevalences of the disease. On the basis of the results of the annual activity survey on HSCT of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), we have analyzed the factors associated with differences between more than 600 teams participating from more than 40 countries over a time span of 15 years. The results show a more complex situation. The gross national income per capita, number of transplant teams per 10 million inhabitants or per 10,000 km2, team size and team experience all impact on transplant activity. Furthermore, hitherto unknown factors must add to the decisions to perform or not to perform HSCT. These data illustrate that more research is needed to understand the mechanism of HSCT activity and to enable health-care agencies to provide the necessary infrastructure.

Indexed as

EuropeHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansRegistriesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18724308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.