Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18724301›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2008

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for correction of primary immunodeficiencies.

Ah Filipovich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Increase of bone marrow macrophages and CD8Bone marrow transplantation · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers in chronic graft-versus-host disease.Expert review of hematology · 2011
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ah FilipovichImmunodeficiency and Histiocytosis Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. lisa.filipovich@cchmc.org
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first hematopoietic cell transplants in humans with durable success were reported in 1968, in three patients with primary immunodeficiencies who received grafts from HLA-matched siblings (two with SCID and one with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome). Significant progress has been made in correcting lethal primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) with hematopoietic transplantation in the ensuing 40 years due to several factors: (1) ability to phenotype and quantitate (CD34+) hematopoietic stem cells, (2) advent of high-resolution tissue typing, (3) availability of closely matched unrelated donor bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells, and cord blood, and (4) the application of reduced intensity conditioning regimens pre-transplant. Furthermore, the genetic basis of the majority of lethal PIDs has been defined, allowing more accurate studies of the natural history of the disorders without HCT intervention, and providing a compelling rationale for early transplantation in disorders with median survivals of 15-20 years. In the current era, we can identify several factors, which influence the ultimate success of HCT for PID. These include the age at transplant and general health of the patient. Young age is associated with fewer comorbidities and less frequent pre-transplant exposure to herpes family and enteric viruses, thus lowering the risks of related post-transplant complications. The careful selection of pre-transplant conditioning can significantly reduce early TRM in patients with certain immunodeficiencies, and increase the probability of durable engraftment in others. Because of the specific needs of children with PIDs, HCT from unrelated donors should, ideally, be performed in centers with extensive expertise and experience in the treatment of such disorders. In such centers, donor selection based on high-resolution tissue typing, younger age and specific viral immunity has led to survival rates following matched unrelated donor HCT for PIDs, which are very similar to those obtained with HCT from matched sibling donors. While ultimate success rates are similar, transplant-related management of children receiving unrelated grafts is considerably more complicated and prolonged than following matched sibling HCT.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansHyper-IgM Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Type 1Immunologic Deficiency SyndromesLymphohistiocytosis, HemophagocyticSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyWiskott-Aldrich Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID18724301
OpenAlexW2101366992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.