Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18724294›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2008

Current status of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma.

J Mehta, S Singhal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J MehtaThe Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. j-mehta@northwestern.edu
S Singhal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) improves response rates and survival in myeloma. This is despite the fact that unlike other hematologic malignancies treated with high-dose therapy and autotransplantation, autografted myeloma patients continue to relapse several years after transplantation and the procedure is not curative in the majority of patients. However, patients surviving for several years with essentially normal quality of life may be considered to be 'operationally cured.' Also, unlike with other hematologic malignancies relapsing after an autograft, recurrent disease can be treated with novel agents or repeat high-dose chemotherapy and autologous or allogeneic HSCT--and long-term survival is seen in a number of patients after relapse. Although tandem transplantation is clearly superior to a single autograft, it is unclear if this should be offered to all patients routinely or only to those not attaining CR after one transplant. It is also unclear if novel agents should be used before transplantation or reserved for relapse. Despite their excellent activity, there is no evidence that novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide can replace high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT, and the best strategy is to use all options in all eligible patients at appropriate stages of the disease.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansMultiple MyelomaTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18724294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.