ReviewBone marrow transplantation2008
Current status of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- Cyclophosphamide vs salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF as chemo-mobilization in Asian patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Trial
- Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma without Cryopreservation.Bone marrow research · 2012Article
- Clinical impact and resource utilization after stem cell mobilization failure in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2010Article
- A simplified method for stem cell autografting in multiple myeloma: a single institution experience.Bone marrow transplantation · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) improves response rates and survival in myeloma. This is despite the fact that unlike other hematologic malignancies treated with high-dose therapy and autotransplantation, autografted myeloma patients continue to relapse several years after transplantation and the procedure is not curative in the majority of patients. However, patients surviving for several years with essentially normal quality of life may be considered to be 'operationally cured.' Also, unlike with other hematologic malignancies relapsing after an autograft, recurrent disease can be treated with novel agents or repeat high-dose chemotherapy and autologous or allogeneic HSCT--and long-term survival is seen in a number of patients after relapse. Although tandem transplantation is clearly superior to a single autograft, it is unclear if this should be offered to all patients routinely or only to those not attaining CR after one transplant. It is also unclear if novel agents should be used before transplantation or reserved for relapse. Despite their excellent activity, there is no evidence that novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide can replace high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT, and the best strategy is to use all options in all eligible patients at appropriate stages of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18724294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.