Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18724293›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2008

Transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Ra Krance

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ra KranceDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. rkrance@bcm.trnc.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EFS for children with ALL continues to increase and is predicted to reach 90% with current therapy. Better understanding of leukemia cell biology and pharmacogenetics has led to the design of more effective treatment and also refined the prognostic features associated with a poor outcome. ALL characterized by the translocation t(9;22) or t(4;11), or by a hypodiploid karyotype or by an incomplete response to induction therapy is likely to relapse. SCT for ALL is largely used to treat patients failing primary chemotherapy but is selectively included as part of initial therapy for children at high risk for relapse. If SCT is going to become the primary therapy for children with ALL in first remission, the regimen-related mortality must approach 0%, and the risk for severe acute and chronic GVHD should be less than 5%. Salvage therapy after ALL relapse remains the major indication for SCT. The time required to find a suitable match has led to the use of cord blood and haploidentical related donors as stem cell sources. For children who relapse, SCT is likely to remain the principal option to promote survival. Efforts to reduce both the risk of relapse and the transplant regimen toxicity, both immediate and delayed, must continue.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationChildHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID18724293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.