Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18723862›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2008

Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.

Maria Crotty, Lynne C Giles, Julie Halbert, Julie Harding, Michelle Miller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria CrottyFlinders University Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. maria.crotty@rgh.sa.gov.au
Lynne C Giles
Julie Halbert
Julie Harding
Michelle Miller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto assess the effect of home versus day rehabilitation on patient outcomes.

designrandomised controlled trial.

settingpost-hospital rehabilitation.

participantstwo hundred and twenty-nine hospitalised patients referred for ambulatory rehabilitation.

interventionshospital-based day rehabilitation programme versus home-based rehabilitation programme.

main outcome measuresat 3 months, information was collected on hospital readmission, transfer to residential care, functional level, quality of life, carer stress and carer quality of life. At 6 months, place of residence, hospital re-admissions and mortality status were collected.

resultsthere were significant improvements in the functional outcomes from baseline to 3 months for all participants. At discharge, carers of patients in day hospital reported higher Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) scores in comparison to home rehabilitation carers (4.95 versus 3.56, P = 0.047). Patients in day hospital had double the risk of readmission compared to those in home rehabilitation (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.9). This effect persisted at 6 months.

conclusionsday hospital patients are more likely to be readmitted to hospital possibly due to increased access to admitting medical staff. This small trial favours the home as a better site for post-hospital rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overDay Care, MedicalFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHome Care ServicesHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPatient ReadmissionQuality of Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID18723862
PMCPMC2582455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.