Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18723623›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008

Chemotaxis as an emergent property of a swarm.

Rion G Taylor, Roy D Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Linking single-cell decisions to collective behaviours in social bacteria.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Collective gradient sensing and chemotaxis: modeling and recent developments.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2018
    Review
  7. Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2017
    Article
  8. Single-cell twitching chemotaxis in developing biofilms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gliding motility revisited: how do the myxobacteria move without flagella?Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2010
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rion G TaylorDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA.
Roy D Welch
Syracuse University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have characterized and quantified a form of bacterial chemotaxis that manifests only as an emergent property by measuring symmetry breaking in a swarm of Myxococcus xanthus exposed to a two-dimensional nutrient gradient from within an agar substrate. M. xanthus chemotaxis requires cell-cell contact and coordinated motility, as individual motile cells exhibit only nonvectorial movement in the presence of a nutrient gradient. Genes that specifically affect M. xanthus chemotaxis include at least 10 of the 53 that express enhancer binding proteins of the NtrC-like class, an indication that this behavior is controlled through transcription, most likely by a complex signal transduction network.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisLocomotionBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsFoodGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMyxococcus xanthusSignal TransductionBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18723623
PMCPMC2566203
OpenAlexW2035050120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.