Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18723285›Full record

ArticlePain2008

Profound reduction of somatic and visceral pain in mice by intrathecal administration of the anti-migraine drug, sumatriptan.

Tetsuro Nikai, Allan I Basbaum, Andrew H Ahn

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting GCell reports. Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modulation of CGRP-induced light aversion in wild-type mice by a 5-HT(1B/D) agonist.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The complex actions of sumatriptan on rat dural afferents.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tetsuro NikaiDepartment of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan Departments of Anatomy and Physiology, W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA Departments of Neurology and Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Allan I Basbaum
Andrew H Ahn
University of California, San Francisco · USShimane University · JP

Funding

Role of the Mrg family of GPCRs in nociceptionP01NS048499 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 2005 to 2009
$5.5M
BRAINSTEM CONTROL OF PAIN TRANSMISSIONR01NS014627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 1985 to 2016
$3.9M
Brainstem control of pain transmissionR37NS014627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 2008 to 2014
$3.6M
Mechanisms of Triptan Action in Migraine and PainK08NS047113 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHN, ANDREW H · 2004 to 2009
$861k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS047113NINDS NIH HHS NS 14627NINDS NIH HHS NS 47113NINDS NIH HHS NS 48499NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS048499NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS014627NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS014627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sumatriptan and the other triptan drugs target the serotonin receptor subtypes1B, 1D, and 1F (5-HT(1B/D/F)), and are prescribed widely in the treatment of migraine. An anti-migraine action of triptans has been postulated at multiple targets, within the brain and at both the central and peripheral terminals of trigeminal "pain-sensory" fibers. However, as triptan receptors are also located on "pain-sensory" afferents throughout the body, it is surprising that triptans only reduce migraine pain in humans, and experimental cranial pain in animals. Here we tested the hypothesis that sumatriptan can indeed reduce non-cranial, somatic and visceral pain in behavioral models in mice. Because sumatriptan must cross the blood brain barrier to reach somatic afferent terminals in the spinal cord, we compared systemic to direct spinal (intrathecal) sumatriptan. Acute nociceptive thresholds were not altered by sumatriptan pre-treatment, regardless of route. However, in behavioral models of persistent inflammatory pain, we found a profound anti-hyperalgesic action of intrathecal, but not systemic, sumatriptan. By contrast, sumatriptan was completely ineffective in an experimental model of neuropathic pain. The pronounced activity of intrathecal sumatriptan against inflammatory pain in mice raises the possibility that there is a wider spectrum of therapeutic indications for triptans beyond headache.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCarrageenanDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFormaldehydeHot TemperatureHyperalgesiaInflammationInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SpinalInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiceNeuralgiaAcetic AcidAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticCarrageenanFormaldehydeSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID18723285
PMCPMC2869302
OpenAlexW2000254352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.