ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2008
Ordered stratification to reduce heterogeneity in linkage to diabetes-related quantitative traits.
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping quantitative traits in unselected families: algorithms and examples.Genetic epidemiology · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Phenotypic heterogeneity complicates detection of genomic loci predisposing to type 2 diabetes, potentially obscuring or unmasking specific loci. We conducted ordered-subsets linkage analyses (OSAs) for diabetes-related quantitative traits (fasting insulin and glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and 28-year-time-averaged fasting plasma glucose (FPG)) from 330 families of the Framingham Offspring Study. We calculated mean BMI, waist circumference (WC), and a diabetes "age-of-onset score" for each family. We constructed subsets by adding one family at a time in increasing (lean family to obese) or decreasing (obese to lean) adiposity order, or increasing or decreasing propensity to develop diabetes at a younger age, with the OSA LOD reported as the maximum LOD observed in any subset. Permutation P values tested the hypothesis that phenotypic ordering showed stronger linkage than random ordering. On chromosome 1, ordering by increasing family mean WC increased linkage to time-averaged FPG at 256 cM from LOD = 2.4 to 3.5 (permuted P = 0.02) and to HbA1c at 180 cM from LOD = 2.0 to 3.3 (P = 0.01). On chromosome 19, ordering by decreasing WC increased linkage to fasting insulin at 68 cM from LOD = 2.7 to 4.6 (P = 0.002), and ordering by decreasing propensity to develop diabetes at a young age increased linkage to fasting insulin at 73 cM from LOD = 2.7 to 4.0 (P = 0.046). We conclude that chromosomes 1 and 19 could harbor adiposity-interacting diabetes susceptibility genes. Such interactions might also influence trait-locus associations and may be useful to consider in diabetes genome-wide association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.