Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18719453›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology2008

Intracarotid delivery of drugs: the potential and the pitfalls.

Shailendra Joshi, Phillip M Meyers, Eugene Ornstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Modeling hyperosmotic blood-brain barrier opening within human tissue-engineered in vitro brain microvessels.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shailendra JoshiDepartment of Anesthesiology, PH 505, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA. sj121@columbia.edu
Phillip M Meyers
Eugene Ornstein

Funding

Optical Spectroscopy for Management of Cancer TreatmentU54CA104677 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BIGIO, IRVING J · 2003 to 2007
$5.6M
NITROXIDERGIC CEREBROVASCULAR TONE DURING ANESTHESIAK08GM000698 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JOSHI, SHAILENDRA · 2001 to 2005
$619k
NCI NIH HHS U54-CA 104677NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM000698NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM 00698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major efforts to selectively deliver drugs to the brain in the past decade have relied on smart molecular techniques to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, whereas intraarterial drug delivery has drawn relatively little attention. Meanwhile, rapid progress has been made in the field of endovascular surgery. Modern endovascular procedures can permit highly targeted drug delivery by the intracarotid route. Intracarotid drug delivery can be the primary route of drug delivery or it could be used to facilitate the delivery of smart neuropharmaceuticals. There have been few attempts to systematically understand the kinetics of intracarotid drugs. Anecdotal data suggest that intracarotid drug delivery is effective in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm, thromboembolic strokes, and neoplasms. Neuroanesthesiologists are frequently involved in the care of such high-risk patients. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the applications of intracarotid drug delivery and the unusual kinetics of intracarotid drugs.

Indexed as

Carotid ArteriesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCerebrovascular CirculationDrug Delivery SystemsHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18719453
PMCPMC3999414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.