Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18719088›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2009

Visual and cognitive deficits predict stopping or restricting driving: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study (SEEDS).

Lisa Keay, Beatriz Munoz, Kathleen A Turano, Shirin E Hassan, Cynthia A Munro, Donald D Duncan, Kevin Baldwin, Srichand Jasti, Emily W Gower, Sheila K West

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Driving Status and Transportation Disadvantage Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A link between attentional function, effective eye movements, and driving ability.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa KeayDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. lkeay1@jhmi.edu
Beatriz Munoz
Kathleen A Turano
Shirin E Hassan
Cynthia A Munro
Donald D Duncan
Kevin Baldwin
Srichand Jasti
Emily W Gower
Sheila K West
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory · USMinnesota Lions Eye Bank · USInstitute of Behavioral Sciences · JPThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

Who drives safely? Visual/cognitive predictors in EldersR01AG023110 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WEST, SHEILA K · 2004 to 2008
$5.1M
NIA NIH HHS AG23110NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the visual and other factors that predict stopping or restricting driving in older drivers.

methodsA group of 1425 licensed drivers aged 67 to 87 years, who were residents of greater Salisbury, participated. At 1 year after enrollment, this group was categorized into those who had stopped driving, drove only within their neighborhood, or continued to drive beyond their neighborhood. At baseline, a battery of structured questionnaires, vision, and cognitive tests were administered. Multivariate analysis determined the factors predictive of stopping or restricting driving 12 months later.

resultsOf the 1425 enrolled, 1237 (87%) were followed up at 1 year. Excluding those who were already limiting their driving at baseline (n = 35), 1.5% (18/1202) had stopped and 3.4% (41/1202) had restricted their driving. The women (odds ratio [OR], 4.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-8.20) and those who prefer to be driven (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.91-8.00) were more likely to stop or restrict driving. Depressive symptoms increased likelihood of restricting or stopping driving (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.009-1.16 per point Geriatric Depression Scale). Slow visual scanning and psychomotor speed (Trail Making Test, Part A: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), poor visuoconstructional skills (Beery-Buktenica Test of Visual Motor Integration: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25), and reduced contrast sensitivity (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.28) predicted stopping or reducing driving. Visual field loss and visual attention were not associated. The effect of vision on changing driving behavior was partially mediated by cognition, depression, and baseline driving preferences.

conclusionsIn this cohort, contrast sensitivity and cognitive function were independently associated with incident cessation or restriction of driving space. These data suggest drivers with functional deficits make difficult decisions to restrict or stop driving.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAutomobile DrivingCognition DisordersContrast SensitivityDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMarylandPsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceSurveys and QuestionnairesVision DisordersVision TestsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID18719088
PMCPMC2633220
OpenAlexW2023904608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.