Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18718879›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2009

Protein modifications in transcription elongation.

Stephen M Fuchs, R Nicholas Laribee, Brian D Strahl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chromatin regulation and dynamics in stem cells.Current topics in developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen M FuchsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
R Nicholas Laribee
Brian D Strahl
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Role of Set2 and H3 methylation in chromatin functionR01GM068088 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STRAHL, BRIAN D · 2003 to 2017
$3.4M
Regulation of Set2p methyltransferase: Effects on chromatin and transcriptionF32GM080896 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FUCHS, STEPHEN MICHAEL · 2007 to 2009
$110k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM080896NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins play essential roles in regulating signaling, protein-protein modifications and subcellular localization. In this review, we focus on posttranslational modification of histones and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and their roles in gene transcription. A survey of the basic features of PTMs is provided followed by a more detailed account of how PTMs on histones and RNAPII regulate transcription in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We emphasize the interconnections between histone and RNAPII PTMs and speculate upon the larger role PTMs have in regulating protein function in the cell.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistonesHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticHistonesRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18718879
PMCPMC2641038
OpenAlexW2011112306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.