ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2008
A comparison of sexual and asexual replication strategies in a simplified model based on the yeast life cycle.
Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein disorder reduced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to survive heat shock.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Standing genetic variation drives repeatable experimental evolution in outcrossing populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Selective advantage for sexual reproduction with random haploid fusion.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper develops simplified mathematical models describing the mutation-selection balance for the asexual and sexual replication pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or Baker's yeast. The simplified models are based on the single-fitness-peak approximation in quasispecies theory. We assume diploid genomes consisting of two chromosomes, and we assume that each chromosome is functional if and only if its base sequence is identical to some master sequence. The growth and replication of the yeast cells is modeled as a first-order process, with first-order growth rate constants that are determined by whether a given genome consists of zero, one, or two functional chromosomes. In the asexual pathway, we assume that a given diploid cell divides into two diploids. For the sake of generality, our model allows for mitotic recombination and asymmetric chromosome segregation. In the sexual pathway, we assume that a given diploid cell divides into two diploids, each of which then divide into two haploids. The resulting four haploids enter a haploid pool, where they grow and replicate until they meet another haploid with which to fuse. In the sexual pathway, we consider two mating strategies: (1) a selective strategy, where only haploids with functional chromosomes can fuse with one another; (2) a random strategy, where haploids randomly fuse with one another. When the cost for sex is low, we find that the selective mating strategy leads to the highest mean fitness of the population, when compared to all of the other strategies. When the cost for sex is low, sexual replication with random mating also has a higher mean fitness than asexual replication without mitotic recombination or asymmetric chromosome segregation. We also show that, at low replication fidelities, sexual replication with random mating has a higher mean fitness than asexual replication, as long as the cost for sex is low. If the fitness penalty for having a defective chromosome is sufficiently high and the cost for sex sufficiently low, then at low replication fidelities the random mating strategy has a mean fitness that is a factor of square root 2 larger than the asexual mean fitness. We argue that for yeast, the selective mating strategy is the one that is closer to reality, which if true suggests that sex may provide a selective advantage under considerably more relaxed conditions than previous research has indicated. The results of this paper also suggest that S. cerevisiae switches from asexual to sexual replication when stressed, because stressful growth conditions provide an opportunity for the yeast to clear out deleterious mutations from their genomes. That being said, our model does not contradict theories for the evolution of sex that argue that sex evolved because it allows a population to more easily adapt to changing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18716819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.