ArticlePLoS computational biology2008
Coordinate regulation of G protein signaling via dynamic interactions of receptor and GAP.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systems modeling of oncogenic G-protein and GPCR signaling reveals unexpected differences in downstream pathway activation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- A Collision Coupling Model Governs the Activation of Neuronal GIRK1/2 Channels by Muscarinic-2 Receptors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The binding of activated GαThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Recently duplicated plant heterotrimeric Gα proteins with subtle biochemical differences influence specific outcomes of signal-response coupling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Yeast GPCR signaling reflects the fraction of occupied receptors, not the number.Molecular systems biology · 2016Article
- Invited review: Activation of G proteins by GTP and the mechanism of Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis.Biopolymers · 2016Review
- Sugar-induced endocytosis of plant 7TM-RGS proteins.Plant signaling & behavior · 2013Article
- Mechanism of activation and inactivation of Gq/phospholipase C-β signaling nodes.Chemical reviews · 2011Article
- Regulators of G-protein signaling and their Gα substrates: promises and challenges in their use as drug discovery targets.Pharmacological reviews · 2011Review
- Kinetic scaffolding mediated by a phospholipase C-beta and Gq signaling complex.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2010Article
- Theme and variations on kinetics of GPCR activation/deactivation.Journal of receptor and signal transduction research · 2010Review
- Regulators of G-protein signaling accelerate GPCR signaling kinetics and govern sensitivity solely by accelerating GTPase activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010Article
- Kinetics of M1 muscarinic receptor and G protein signaling to phospholipase C in living cells.The Journal of general physiology · 2010Article
- Article
- Fluorescence changes reveal kinetic steps of muscarinic receptor-mediated modulation of phosphoinositides and Kv7.2/7.3 K+ channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2009Article
- Tripping a switch: PDZRhoGEF rgRGS-bound Galpha13.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2008Article
- Coordinating speed and amplitude in G-protein signaling.Current biology : CB · 2008Review
- The structure of dynamic GPCR signaling networks.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Signal output from receptor-G-protein-effector modules is a dynamic function of the nucleotide exchange activity of the receptor, the GTPase-accelerating activity of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and their interactions. GAPs may inhibit steady-state signaling but may also accelerate deactivation upon removal of stimulus without significantly inhibiting output when the receptor is active. Further, some effectors (e.g., phospholipase C-beta) are themselves GAPs, and it is unclear how such effectors can be stimulated by G proteins at the same time as they accelerate G protein deactivation. The multiple combinations of protein-protein associations and interacting regulatory effects that allow such complex behaviors in this system do not permit the usual simplifying assumptions of traditional enzyme kinetics and are uniquely subject to systems-level analysis. We developed a kinetic model for G protein signaling that permits analysis of both interactive and independent G protein binding and regulation by receptor and GAP. We evaluated parameters of the model (all forward and reverse rate constants) by global least-squares fitting to a diverse set of steady-state GTPase measurements in an m1 muscarinic receptor-G(q)-phospholipase C-beta1 module in which GTPase activities were varied by approximately 10(4)-fold. We provide multiple tests to validate the fitted parameter set, which is consistent with results from the few previous pre-steady-state kinetic measurements. Results indicate that (1) GAP potentiates the GDP/GTP exchange activity of the receptor, an activity never before reported; (2) exchange activity of the receptor is biased toward replacement of GDP by GTP; (3) receptor and GAP bind G protein with negative cooperativity when G protein is bound to either GTP or GDP, promoting rapid GAP binding and dissociation; (4) GAP indirectly stabilizes the continuous binding of receptor to G protein during steady-state GTPase hydrolysis, thus further enhancing receptor activity; and (5) receptor accelerates GDP/GTP exchange primarily by opening an otherwise closed nucleotide binding site on the G protein but has minimal effect on affinity (K(assoc) = k(assoc)/k(dissoc)) of G protein for nucleotide. Model-based simulation explains how GAP activity can accelerate deactivation >10-fold upon removal of agonist but still allow high signal output while the receptor is active. Analysis of GTPase flux through distinct reaction pathways and consequent accumulation of specific GTPase cycle intermediates indicate that, in the presence of a GAP, the receptor remains bound to G protein throughout the GTPase cycle and that GAP binds primarily during the GTP-bound phase. The analysis explains these behaviors and relates them to the specific regulatory phenomena described above. The work also demonstrates the applicability of appropriately data-constrained system-level analysis to signaling networks of this scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.