Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18715918›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2008

Analysis of the interaction between the UL11 and UL16 tegument proteins of herpes simplex virus.

Pei-Chun Yeh, David G Meckes, John W Wills

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HSV-1 Cytoplasmic Envelopment and Egress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assembly and Egress of an Alphaherpesvirus Clockwork.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pei-Chun YehDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
David G Meckes
John W Wills
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Molecular Functions and Mechanisms of UL16, A Conserved Tegument Protein of HSVR01AI071286 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WILLS, JOHN W. · 2007 to 2016
$5.1M
VIRUSES AND CANCERT32CA060395 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MEYERS, CRAIG M · 1994 to 2021
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA60395NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060395NIAID NIH HHS AI071286NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UL11 and UL16 tegument proteins of herpes simplex virus are conserved throughout the herpesvirus family. Previous studies have shown that these proteins interact, perhaps to link UL16-bound nucleocapsids to UL11, which resides on the cytoplasmic face of the trans-Golgi network, where maturation budding occurs. Little is known about the interaction except that it requires the leucine-isoleucine (LI) and acidic cluster motifs in UL11 and that no other viral proteins are involved. In particular, the important question of whether these two proteins bind to each other directly has not been addressed. Accordingly, UL11 and UL16 were expressed in bacteria, and the purified proteins were found to retain the ability to interact in a manner that was dependent upon the LI and acidic cluster. In an attempt to map the UL11-binding site contained in UL16, a large number of deletion mutants were constructed. The first 40 (nonconserved) amino acids were found to be dispensable, but all the other constructs failed to bind UL11 or had poor expression in transfected cells, suggesting that UL16 is very sensitive to alterations and probably lacks a multidomain structure. As an alternative strategy for identifying residues that are important for the interaction, the cysteines of UL16 were investigated, because many of these are highly conserved. Approximately half of the 20 cysteines in UL16 have been shown to be covalently modified by N-ethylmaleimide, and this treatment was found to block the interaction with UL11. Moreover, individual serine replacements of six of the most conserved cysteine residues were made, and four of these disrupted the interaction with UL11 without affecting protein stability. However, the UL11-UL16 interaction does not involve the formation of interspecies disulfide bonds, because binding occurred even when all the cysteines in UL11 were eliminated. Thus, UL16 directly interacts with UL11 and does so in a manner that requires free cysteines.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCloning, MolecularConserved SequenceCysteineEthylmaleimideGene ExpressionHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein BindingCysteineEthylmaleimideRecombinant ProteinsSerineUL11 protein, herpesviridaeViral Structural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18715918
PMCPMC2573186
OpenAlexW2149228676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.