Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18715218›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2008

Effects of chromium picolinate on food intake and satiety.

Stephen D Anton, Christopher D Morrison, William T Cefalu, Corby K Martin, Sandra Coulon, Paula Geiselman, Hongmei Han, Christy L White, Donald A Williamson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromium picolinate supplementation for overweight or obese adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A pilot study of chromium picolinate for weight loss.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2010
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dietary supplements for lipedema.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for chromium.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen D AntonPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. santon@aginf.ufl.edu
Christopher D Morrison
William T Cefalu
Corby K Martin
Sandra Coulon
Paula Geiselman
Hongmei Han
Christy L White
Donald A Williamson
Louisiana State University · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromium picolinate (CrPic) has been shown to attenuate weight gain, but the mechanism underlying this effect is unknown.

methodsWe assessed the effect of CrPic in modulating food intake in healthy, overweight, adult women who reported craving carbohydrates (Study 1) and performed confirmatory studies in Sprague-Dawley rats (Study 2). Study 1 utilized a double-blind placebo-controlled design and randomly assigned 42 overweight adult women with carbohydrate cravings to receive 1,000 mg of CrPic or placebo for 8 weeks. Food intake at breakfast, lunch, and dinner was directly measured at baseline, week 1, and week 8. For Study 2, Sprague-Dawley rats were fasted for 24 h and subsequently injected intraperitoneally with 0, 1, 10, or 50 microg/kg CrPic. Subsequently, rats were implanted with an indwelling third ventricular cannula. Following recovery, 0, 0.4, 4, or 40 ng of CrPic was injected directly into the brain via the intracerebroventricular cannula, and spontaneous 24-h food intake was measured.

resultsStudy 1 demonstrated that CrPic, as compared to placebo, reduced food intake (P<0.0001), hunger levels (P<0.05), and fat cravings (P<0.0001) and tended to decrease body weight (P=0.08). In study 2, intraperitoneal administration resulted in a subtle decrease in food intake at only the highest dose (P=0.03). However, when administered centrally, CrPic dose-dependently decreased food intake (P<0.05).

conclusionsThese data suggest CrPic has a role in food intake regulation, which may be mediated by a direct effect on the brain.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBlood GlucoseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEatingFemaleHumansInsulinIron Chelating AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPicolinic AcidsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBlood GlucoseInsulinIron Chelating Agentspicolinic acidPicolinic Acids

Identifiers

PMID18715218
PMCPMC2753428
OpenAlexW2025597727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.